nanog mailing list archives
Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 1996 16:11:20 -0500
For crying out loud, this should be the least of our worries. :-) - paul At 12:48 PM 12/4/96 -0800, Paul A Vixie wrote:
That's fixed by having multiple note-takers.Yes, that is certainly one approach. Then the issue becomes collecting information from presenters and note-takers to build the on-line meeting notes.I don't agree. The issue remains: if multiple note-takers are available, why isn't someone stepping forward to help out with the *current* work?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Creation of working groups within NANOG Paul Ferguson (Dec 03)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Arun Welch (Dec 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Stan Barber (Dec 03)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Arun Welch (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Derek Elder (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Arun Welch (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Stan Barber (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Paul A Vixie (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Paul Ferguson (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Tim Salo (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Stan Barber (Dec 04)