nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAVYJOBS.COM
From: Havard.Eidnes () runit sintef no
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:05:13 +0200
Hm, I know I may catch some flak for this, but...
[...] The YMBK proposal from the second NSF workshop will almost certainly be the way of the future, and we will see a lot more TLD's and hopefully no one of them will ever be as ugly as .COM is now.
It seems to me that the problem which pushes in the direction of lots of more TLDs is fairly US-specific, as the vast majority of registrants in the COM domain are US companies. Why, then, do you want to pollute the name space used for naming the national domain names with what is essentially a US-originating problem? Is there someone who thinks that trademark problems will be any less of a concern by creating lots of new TLDs -- won't a trade- mark owner be equally interested in protecting his rights in all the new TLDs, especially if the new TLDs are "generic"? - HÃ¥vard
Current thread:
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM, (continued)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Paul A Vixie (Apr 22)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Vadim Antonov (Apr 22)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Sean Doran (Apr 22)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Paul A Vixie (Apr 22)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Alec H. Peterson (Apr 22)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Arun Welch (Apr 23)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Sean Doran (Apr 22)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Paul A Vixie (Apr 22)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM David Carmean (Apr 23)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Paul A Vixie (Apr 23)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Havard . Eidnes (Apr 24)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Paul A Vixie (Apr 24)
- Re: NAVYJOBS.COM Paul A Vixie (Apr 22)