nanog mailing list archives
Re: CSPAN at NANOG?
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 09:27:37 -0400
Thank you. The voice of sanity prevails. :-) - paul At 08:38 AM 4/12/96 -0400, William B. Norton wrote:
Hi all - Thanks for your feedback regarding CSPAN at the next NANOG. Based on the concerns that some of you raised I've decided *not* to send out the media advisory to CSPAN and the press. Issues leading to that decision included 1) attendees holding their tongues for fear of being misquoted, "Joe X from NetQ said '....' might be stated more succinctly as "NetQ representatives said '.....' or "NetQ said '....' 2) the press misunderstanding and then overemphasizing some issues There was also a fear that marketing folks might be attracted to the bright lights and degrade the technical quality of the meeting. Reasonable concerns. Cheers - Bill ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- William Norton <wbn () merit edu> (313) 936-2656
Current thread:
- CSPAN at NANOG? William B. Norton (Apr 12)
- Re: CSPAN at NANOG? Michael Dillon (Apr 12)
- Need critiques of this RFC draft Michael Dillon (Apr 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CSPAN at NANOG? Paul Ferguson (Apr 12)