nanog mailing list archives

Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role


From: "Mike O'Dell" <mo () uunet uu net>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 21:39:55 -0500


Or as Bullwinkle said:

        "No doubt about it, I gotta get another hat!"


For my money, the solution is IPv6 with 8+8 addresses, so the
routing goop can be changed without impacting the transport
machinery.  this will allow essentially transparent "renumbering"
if done right.

And rule (13):

        "Often the easiest way to resolve a problem is to simply
         agree not to have it."

        -mo



Current thread: