nanog mailing list archives
Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22
From: hwb () upeksa sdsc edu (Hans-Werner Braun)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 23:09:42 PDT
Sorry to disagree with you Donald but i have been quite explicitly told that if IANA is under the authority of anyone it is under the authority of NOT DoD NOR NSF but rather the **Advanced Research Projects Agency**
I assume by some approximation ARPA is to DoD what NCRI is to NSF. Part of a specific agency. NCRI is home of the NSFNET program. ARPA is not an independent agency. TCP/IP came clearly out of ARPA, though.
Current thread:
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22, (continued)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David R Conrad (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Michael Dillon (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David R Conrad (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Eric . M . Aupperle (Sep 22)
- Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Paul Ferguson (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David R Conrad (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 John Riordan (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Nick Williams (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Ehud Gavron (Sep 24)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Dave Siegel (Sep 24)