nanog mailing list archives
Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22
From: paul () hawksbill sprintmrn com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 17:44:29 -0500 (EST)
I'm puzzled why anyone would think that, these days, IANA is under US DoD authority. If IANA were under any US Goverment authority, it would be NSF. But IANA is appointed by the IAB which is not under US gov authority except to the extent that it has ties to ISOC and ISOC is incorporated in the US. Like most "authority" in the Internet, IANA controls the IP address space because it is to everyone's advantage to cooperate. Anyone can get up a machine and use any IP address they want, they will just have a lot of trouble talking to anyone else if they don't coordinate with IANA (or actually the registries to whom IANA has delegated almost all the day to day coordination activities).
Hell, I kinda appreciated the hijack discussion myself. :-) - paul
Current thread:
- 206.82.160.0/22 Kai (Sep 21)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David R Conrad (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Michael Dillon (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David R Conrad (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Eric . M . Aupperle (Sep 22)
- Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Paul Ferguson (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David R Conrad (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 John Riordan (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Nick Williams (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Ehud Gavron (Sep 24)