nanog mailing list archives

Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x?


From: Jeremy Porter <jerry () fc net>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 01:26:19 -0600 (CST)

If we had a good method for people to indicate routes that they didn't want to
be aggregated, then more proxy aggregation could be done safely.


      If I may...  The idea of using a routing registry for
      this purpose has been suggested before. I still think
      it is a valid approach.  Could be very useful in assisting
      with better proxy aggregation for all.

Let me just say I think the RR has some good uses, i.e.
finding out what people intended the routing to look like, etc.

I don't really understand how a RR can help with proxy aggregation
seeing as the route objects really only provide origin AS
and regular aggregation.  

It seems to me dual homed sites which are the concence of
proxy aggregation, can be detected with a reasonably full set
of routes, i.e. the second from AS from the origin in the ASPATH
being different.  (Or some split in the path outside of an
AS communinity or confederation).

But I don't fully understand all the details of this, so I'm
sure someone can correct me if I'm wrong.






Current thread: