nanog mailing list archives
Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage?
From: Dave Curado <dcurado () neteng delphi com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 10:35:34 -0500
In short, I think the chief failing of the RADB is not the toolset, the concept, or the long-term plan, all of which make some to alot of sense. Instead, what seems to have killed it dead is that the RA was too busy to commit the *serious* effort it would have taken to populate the RADB with information from reality in the first place.
This paragraph begs the question: Can the patient be saved? That is, if the concept, toolset and long-term plan make some to alot of sense, do we move forward by fixing the existing problems or starting over?
My feeling is that patient can and should be saved; it is worth the effort to clean up the RADB where it is needed. The tools and concepts work. There is a solid group of people behind the design. As a small provider, we have seen nothing but Good Things since embracing these services. davec
Current thread:
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage?, (continued)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Alan Hannan (Dec 18)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Nathan Stratton (Dec 18)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? William B. Norton (Dec 19)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Gordon Cook (Dec 19)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Curtis Villamizar (Dec 21)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Alan Hannan (Dec 18)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Hans-Werner Braun (Dec 20)