nanog mailing list archives
Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage?
From: hwb () upeksa sdsc edu (Hans-Werner Braun)
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 7:22:15 PST
We should probably keep in mind that he RA was/is a bit of an insurance policy, created at a time when the networking environment got significantly more complicated/meshed. At least there *is* a funded entity during and after the NSFNET transition to worry about routing. Just creating a change of giving the regionals funding and requiring NSPs to interconnect at the NAPs, while dismantling core infrastructure, would have been dangerous at best. What are the things that would make the RA/RS/RADB more viable?
Current thread:
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage?, (continued)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Sean Doran (Dec 16)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Alan Hannan (Dec 18)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Nathan Stratton (Dec 18)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? William B. Norton (Dec 19)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Gordon Cook (Dec 19)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Curtis Villamizar (Dec 21)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Alan Hannan (Dec 18)
- Re: Are the Route Servers Viable Solutions That Are Being Held Hostage? Hans-Werner Braun (Dec 20)