nanog mailing list archives

Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?


From: "Michael F. Nittmann" <nittmann () wis com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 15:41:57 -0500 (CDT)

my opinion: the nacr style is good, because it requires really getting 
the thing right and thought out.

Anyways, such a db should be used infrequently. aggregation should make 
frequent entries unnecessary. (...)


ripe's telnet is good too, but a real telnet online type access would 
invite sloppyness, and/or repalce route flap by nultiple daily policy 
flap.


Mike


On 
Wed, 19 Apr 1995, Vadim Antonov wrote:

jgs () aads net (John G. Scudder) wrote:

What AS690 does is not just bureaucratic silliness.  It's also enlightened
self-interest (as Curtis keeps saying).  If enough people have the sense to
want to protect themselves, the Routing Registry will fly.

I agree with the idea of Routing Registry (although i'm more than sceptical
about RADB in its present form, replacing distributed computation with
a cental box not controlled by the service providers).

However, my point is that it should be easy to use and should be on-line;
the NACR-style configuration nightmare is not going to fly.

--vadim


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael F. Nittmann                                             nittmann () wis com
Network Architect                                               nittmann () b3 com 
B3 Corporation, Marshfield, WI (CIX Member)               (715) 387 1700 xt. 158
US Cyber (SM), Washington DC                              (715) 573 2448
                                                          (715) 831 7922
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Current thread: