nanog mailing list archives
Re: Comments
From: "Martin Lee Schoffstall" <schoff () us psi com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 1994 13:13:17 -0400
The only reasonable technical solution of the NAP's, and a process interested in connectivity. Marty
To: bmanning () isi edu (Bill Manning) Cc: ltwu () faline bellcore com, iepg () iepg org, nanog () merit edu, nap-info () merit edu Subject: Re: Comments Date: Wed, 31 Aug 94 16:18:23 -0700 [...] The issue behind the NAP's is that they could have been engineered to use simpler and more mature interconnect technology at the start, but are instead using immature technology to meet non-technical requirements that the customers of the NAPs are not they themselves imposing. [...]The Sprint NAP is using FDDI initially. -tjs
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Comments Tim Salo (Aug 31)
- Re: Comments Milo S. Medin (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Bill Manning (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Joseph W. Stroup (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Bill Manning (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Bill Manning (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Milo S. Medin (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Martin Lee Schoffstall (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comments Joseph W. Stroup (Aug 31)
- Re: Comments Steve Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Dave Sincoskie (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Curtis Villamizar (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Stephen Wolff (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Martin Lee Schoffstall (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Stephen Wolff (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Curtis Villamizar (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Matt Mathis (Sep 02)
- Re: Comments Curtis Villamizar (Sep 02)