Re: What's the easiest way to solve this problem..?

[Brian <briaar () gmail com>]

Thanks guys, I think I'll just setup a second handler even though that's not
ideal.

-Brian

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:52 PM, <egypt () metasploit com> wrote:

> Sure, the easy way is to have your AutoRunScript send the second
> session to a different handler.
>
> egypt
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Brian <briaar () gmail com> wrote:
> > No easy way to do this?
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Brian <briaar () gmail com> wrote:
> > > Hey guys,
> > > If I set an AutoRunScript that duplicates my meterpreter session to the
> > > SAME handler, what's the easiest way to disable AutoRunScript after the
> > > first duplication.
> > > i.e.
> > > victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session
> > > using initial handler
> > > <NEED TO PROGRAMICALLY CLEAR AutoRunScript here or else..>
> > > victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session
> > > using initial handler
> > > victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session
> > > using initial handler
> > > victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session
> > > using initial handler
> > > victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session
> > > using initial handler
> > > victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session
> > > using initial handler
> > > victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session
> > > using initial handler
> > > victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session
> > > using initial handler
> > > .....
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Brian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework