Re: meterpreter

[Matt Gardenghi <mtgarden () gmail com>]

metsvc has a memory leak and is really buggy.  Don't use it unless you 
have to...

On 6/23/2010 11:49 AM, Jonathan Cran wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nicolas Krassas<krasn () ans gr>  wrote:
>    
> > >   Thanks for your reply I'm aware of the first 2 options none of them though is what I'm looking for. The service , metsvc  is 
> > > dependent on the framework itself, also implies that I've the right to install a service,  and that is exactly what I don't :)
> > >        
> fyi, metsvc can run standalone (no need for a service install).
>
>   i think i see what you're going for though. You're interested in
> getting SYSTEM on the box via meterpreter completely standalone - no
> incoming / outgoing control to the handler - or implementing a "local"
> handler - you would need to implement something to drive the
> meterpreter dll's - currently this is implemented in ruby via the
> framework - i'm not aware of any other implementation.
>
>    
> > > As for the last one, as I mention the host is almost completely firewalled on outgoing connections.
> > >        
> In the case of the ncat.exe technique, you use the framework to
> connect _in_ to the host, if that helps. you can also specify an
> arbitrary port when you set up the backdoor. Port forwarding is your
> friend?
>
> Not sure this is extremely helpful, but good luck.
>
> jcran
> _______________________________________________
> https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
>    

_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework