Metasploit mailing list archives

why metasploit is so slow?


From: junkoi2004 at gmail.com (Jun Koi)
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:40:43 +0900

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, FRANCIS PROVENCHER
<francis.provencher at msp.gouv.qc.ca> wrote:
Complain about a software you have paid for it, it's a thing... Complain about a free software without giving 1 bits 
of code its an other things....

Again, dont you think that I can contribute something if I have more
clues about why the tool is slow??


I think hd make a great work and the dev team too.

Never doubt about that!

I am surprise to see that some people here are so sensitve with "complains".

Thanks,
J




-----Original Message-----
From: Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com>
To: FRANCIS PROVENCHER <PROF01.SPSSO410 at msp.gouv.qc.ca>
Cc: framework <framework at spool.metasploit.com>

Sent: 3/4/2009 9:25:39 PM
Subject: Re: why metasploit is so slow?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:27 AM, FRANCIS PROVENCHER
<francis.provencher at msp.gouv.qc.ca> wrote:
If your not "very happy", work with the dev team to improve it.... Its just to easy to complain without ?doing 
nothing....
My 2 cents... From a user wery happy with the metasploit framework...


i understand your idea, but users always should and need to complain,
as their ideas and input are important for developers and development
process.

complain alone is also a kind of contributing, anyway. if you know
enough about open source, you will agree with me.

besides, how can you know that i am not doing anything?

thanks,
J

-----Original Message-----
From: Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com>
To: H D Moore <hdm at metasploit.com>
Cc: framework <framework at spool.metasploit.com>

Sent: 3/4/2009 7:41:06 PM
Subject: Re: [framework] why metasploit is so slow?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:25 AM, H D Moore <hdm at metasploit.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 02:07 +0900, Jun Koi wrote:
hi,

i am new to metasploit, and wondering why it is so slow? for example,
"./msfcli -h" takes a minute or so on AMD Turion64, with 2GB RAM. and
that command does nothing, but only shows some messages.

That is why we suggest you use msfconsole -- startup time is very slow
because it has to load ~600+ modules into memory. We do plan on making
some performance improvements in the near future, but using a single
msfconsole/msfweb instance tends to be faster for multiple tasks.

Interesting! So msfconsole loads less modules at startup? Is that
because it has different architecture than msfcli?

How many modules msfconsole loads at startup then?

I am still not very happy with msfconsole, though. On the same machine
it takes around 20-30 seconds to load, and that is still too slow for
me. Do you have any plan to fix msfconsole, too?

Thanks,
J
_______________________________________________
http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework







Current thread: