MetaScanner V1.0

[kalgecin at gmail.com (kalgecin at gmail.com)]

that's correct

On 1/29/09, rOgUe <wullie19 at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> HI kalgecin
>
> Just wanted to make sure ive got this right. Where autopwn with nmap matches
> exploits based on what port is open regardless of OS and services running,
> your scanner matches up exploits relating to what OS service and version are
> running on the target?
>
> -rogue
>
>
>
> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 03:06:44 kalgecin at gmail.com wrote:
> > Hmm... never actually seen the source code for this auxiliary but it
> > appears to me that it scans for a built in browser/smb MetaScan scans
> > all the services (thanks to nmap) and compares those services to an
> > exploit database that can be updated.
> >
> > On 1/26/09, Rob Fuller <mubix at room362.com> wrote:
> > > How does this tool accomplish this better than the autopwn features in
> > > Metasploit? Not trying to be cynical, just trying to get more
> > > information
> > > on
> > > the function of the tool.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:56 AM, kalgecin at gmail.com
> > >
> > > <kalgecin at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > I've finally managed to write a scanner that uses nmap to scan a
> > > > target and parse metasploit exploits to easilly detect vulnerabilities
> > > > for which the framework already has Please check my blog at
> > > > http://kalgecin.blogspot.com/ for more info
> > > > Thanks to all those who gave me some support :)
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework