Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: vnc reverse question
From: mmiller at hick.org (mmiller at hick.org)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:33:51 -0500
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 12:13:58PM -0500, Neil wrote:
Good thing you mentioned about "no installation and does nothing intrusive to the actual machine". I am actually a little concerned with metasploit's exploits. Are there exploits bundled with metasploit that actually modifies something in the target system? I would like to know because I don't want our production server having a strain after I test it. So before I do it in PROD, I would like to know first if that's the case.
I'm not currently aware of any exploits in MSF that would have unrecoverable negative effects on the machine. However, with that said, there are exploits that can cause the machine to crash or be forced to be rebooted after (potentially failed) exploitation. With this in mind, I would highly recommend that you be cautious when using any sort of exploit, whether one from inside MSF or outside, on production machines. If they must be tested against production machines and can't be tested in a lab then I would recommend that you schedule a maintenance window or something where you can test it at off-peak hours, else you risk potential downtime in the worst case scenario. It's really a judgement call on your part, though.
Current thread:
- vnc reverse question Neil (Sep 17)
- Message not available
- Re: vnc reverse question Neil (Sep 17)
- Re: vnc reverse question mmiller at hick.org (Sep 17)
- Re: vnc reverse question H D Moore (Sep 17)
- Re: vnc reverse question Neil (Sep 17)
- Re: vnc reverse question Neil (Sep 17)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- vnc reverse question jerome.athias at caramail.com (Sep 17)
- vnc reverse question mmiller at hick.org (Sep 17)