Interesting People mailing list archives

Re Ask Slashdot: Is There a Good Alternative to Facebook?


From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 05:18:06 +0900




Begin forwarded message:

From: Altieres Rohr <altieres () gmail com>
Date: March 26, 2018 at 10:49:18 AM GMT+9
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re Ask Slashdot: Is There a Good Alternative to Facebook?

They may have dropped the Real Names policy, but the rest is still true.

I think it was less than a year ago that a long-time internet acquaintance of mine lost his Google account.
With it went his YouTube channel and all his Android app purchases, which I thought was criminal unless Google could 
prove some wrongdoing on that front.
The appeal process didn't help. And he says he still doesn't know why he was banned.

Is it really fine that we treat the impossibility of talking to humans at these companies as a fact of life?

Altieres.

2018-03-25 21:44 GMT-03:00 Dave Farber <farber () gmail com>:



Begin forwarded message:

From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com>
Date: March 25, 2018 at 8:18:27 PM EDT
To: Tom Goltz <tgoltz () QuietSoftware com>
Cc: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] Ask Slashdot: Is There a Good Alternative to Facebook?


Unlike on Facebook, where a "real names" policy still is in force,
Google dropped Google+ real name requirements and associated account
actions long ago. That's called learning from your mistakes, something
Facebook seems to be incapable of accomplishing. And Google never
sells your personal information to third parties. Nor do they permit
third parties to buy their way into priority positions or into your
feeds.

I am, frankly, much more interested in how these firms operate today
as opposed to how they operated years ago.

--Lauren--



On 03/25 20:03, Tom Goltz wrote:
Going to Google+ to avoid Facebook is jumping from the frying pan into
the fire.

When Google+ first started up, one of the prominent policies was that
they required "Real Names".  As they originally interpreted that policy,
I was in violation of that policy if I created a profile with the name
of "Tom Goltz" because that is not my legal name.  While I was
*probably* OK, it rapidly became clear that the policy was being
unevenly and inconsistently applied.  Worse yet, if the Google+
ban-hammer came down on your account, it didn't just take out your
ability to use Google+, but your entire Google account.  This meant that
my Gmail account would stop working, my Android phone would be badly
crippled, Google Drive would stop working, and my ability to access
Google Docs would be severely curtailed.

There was no documented or usable appeal process, and it was also almost
impossible to reach a human to appeal a ban by the faceless army making
these arbitrary decisions.  I decided that it simply wasn't worth the
risk to use Google+ and deleted my profile.

Google is also in the same business as Facebook: They're gathering as
much information as they can about people and using that data to sell
advertising.  Given the amount of data they already receive from the
Google services I do use, I don't think it's a good idea to add the
"social" data currently on Facebook into that pot.

On 3/25/2018 3:13 PM, Dave Farber wrote:



Begin forwarded message:

*From:* Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com <mailto:lauren () vortex com>>
*Date:* March 25, 2018 at 3:11:26 PM EDT
*To:* nnsquad () nnsquad org <mailto:nnsquad () nnsquad org>
*Subject:* *[ NNSquad ] Ask Slashdot: Is There a Good Alternative to
Facebook?*


Ask Slashdot: Is There a Good Alternative to Facebook?

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/03/25/0039218/ask-slashdot-is-there-a-good-alternative-to-facebook

   Lauren Weinstein believes Google has already created an
   alternative to Facebook's "sick ecosystem": Google Plus.
   "There are no ads on Google+. Nobody can buy their way into
   your feed or pay Google for priority. Google doesn't
   micromanage what you see. Google doesn't sell your personal
   information to any third parties..." And most importantly,
   "There's much less of an emphasis on hanging around with those
   high school nitwits whom you despised anyway, and much more a
   focus on meeting new persons from around the world for
   intelligent discussions... G+ posts more typically are about
   'us' -- and tend to be far more interesting as a result."
   (Even Linus Torvalds is already reviewing gadgets there.)


Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now> | Modify
<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now
<https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?&&post_id=20180325151320:92F25C58-3060-11E8-B30D-B5215467BAF1>
   [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>







--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein (lauren () vortex com): https://www.vortex.com/lauren 
Lauren's Blog: https://lauren.vortex.com
Google Issues Mailing List: https://vortex.com/google-issues
Founder: Network Neutrality Squad: https://www.nnsquad.org 
        PRIVACY Forum: https://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: https://www.pfir.org/pfir-info
Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Google+: https://google.com/+LaurenWeinstein
Twitter: https://twitter.com/laurenweinstein
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800

Archives | Modify Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now         




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20180328161818:25393B34-32C5-11E8-B723-A0D761212466
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: