Interesting People mailing list archives
vis-a-vis a Government-Backed 5G vs. private enterprise network -- which is better equipped to build out truly national coverage?
From: "Dave Farber" <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:37:29 +0000
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: the keyboard of geoff goodfellow <geoff () iconia com> Date: Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 3:40 PM Subject: vis-a-vis a Government-Backed 5G vs. private enterprise network -- which is better equipped to build out truly national coverage? To: E-mail Pamphleteer Dave Farber's Interesting People list <ip () listbox com
Dave, am Very Curious to know what the Interesting People list collective think or would be IS The Best AND Most Assured/Effective way to effectuate a (long overdue!) solution to what cross country truck driver Curtis Lund comments on (in the ref'd *Variety* article below) regarding The Issue Of Solving The Nationwide Coverage GAPs Issue as exhibited by our extant ("negligent") private enterprise providers we all have been and currently tolerate/living with? viz. excerpting from: http://variety.com/2018/politics/news/fcc-ajit-pai-trump-5g-nationalization-1202680028/ : JANUARY 29, 2018 AT 9:12 AM <http://variety.com/2018/politics/news/fcc-ajit-pai-trump-5g-nationalization-1202680028/#comment-5751083> Curtis Lund says: *As a cross country truck driver I can tell you that there is minimal or zero cellular service along many stretches of our highway system, and many small towns as well that have none.* *So if we are going to compete with China, Japan, and many other countries that have better national coverage for their citizenship than we do*, we have to make 5G nationwide coverage a big part of any infrastructure overhaul plan moving toward. *Right now the major carriers don’t bid on FCC licenses for spectrum in rural areas do to the minimum ROI for their shareholders.* But a 5G nationwide system would benefit all Americans the same way as our nationwide power grid and landline system has done. And one last thing, we Americans pay twice as much in our cellular bills and get half as much compared to what other citizens in many countries do. *They have faster cheaper, and fuller coverage than we do.* Dammit let’s quit talking about it, and just do it! -- Geoff.Goodfellow () iconia com living as The Truth is True http://geoff.livejournal.com This message was sent to the list address and trashed, but can be found online. <https://www.listbox.com/login/messages/view/20180129154010:97480A8E-0534-11E8-878B-992504523499/> ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125 Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20180129163746:A340F69A-053C-11E8-BE96-FFC4CA6BE70F Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- vis-a-vis a Government-Backed 5G vs. private enterprise network -- which is better equipped to build out truly national coverage? Dave Farber (Jan 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- vis-a-vis a Government-Backed 5G vs. private enterprise network -- which is better equipped to build out truly national coverage? Dave Farber (Jan 29)
- Message not available
- Re vis-a-vis a Government-Backed 5G vs. private enterprise network -- which is better equipped to build out truly national coverage? Dave Farber (Jan 30)
- Message not available
- Some history and a viewpoint Re vis-a-vis a Government-Backed 5G vs. private enterprise network -- which is better equipped to build out truly national coverage? Dave Farber (Jan 30)
- Message not available