Re Sign onto EFF's comment to the FCC on their net neutrality proposal

["Dave Farber" <dave () farber net>]

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Chris Beck <cbeck () pacanukeha net>
Date: Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: [IP] Re Sign onto EFF's comment to the FCC on their net
neutrality proposal
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>


Hi Dave,
I don't recall seeing this list of 40 ISPs and other network service
providers (including at least one WISP) in support of the current rules
from a fortnight ago.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/06/isps-across-country-tell-chairman-pai-not-repeal-network-neutrality

Cheers,
Chris


On Jul 6, 2017 7:00 PM, "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com> wrote:

> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* Brett Glass <brett () lariat net>
> *Date:* July 6, 2017 at 5:32:59 PM EDT
> *To:* dave () farber net
> *Subject:* *Re: [IP] Sign onto EFF's comment to the FCC on their net
> neutrality proposal*
>
> Dave, and everyone:
>
> In the interest of equal time and full disclosure, everyone on the list
> deserves to read -- and have an opportunity to sign onto -- comments which
> have been filed  by the hard working ISPs and network engineers who
> actually do the hard work of bringing Internet to end users. These comments
> can be found at
>
> https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1050997938918/70%20WISPS%20Letter.pdf
>
> and
>
>
> https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1051164734733/Ex%20parte%20letter%20-%20Reversal%20of%20Open%20Internet%20Order.pdf
>
> and explain in detail why the findings contained in the FCC's Notice of
> Proposed Rule Making are correct and pertinent. (Readers should also read
> the FCC's fact sheet, which summarizes the NPRM, at
>
> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-344614A1.pdf
>
> to get the whole story.)
>
> My small, innovative wireless ISP -- the first of what is now an entire
> industry -- never could have started had the regulations for which EFF is
> advocating were in place. And it is in jeopardy of having to shutter its
> doors and leave thousands of users without Internet connectivity should the
> regulations remain in place. I urge readers of this list to consider our
> situation before signing onto a document put forth by a lobbying group
> which has no actual experience in providing Internet to the public but only
> in lobbying for its benefactors' agendas.
>
> --Brett Glass
>
> Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/1658324-5772d6ad> | Modify
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
> Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now
> <https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?&&post_id=20170706185635:5A3B75BA-629E-11E7-AD68-E316C38E37B5>
> <http://www.listbox.com>



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20170707074306:6F031A6E-6309-11E7-BEA9-8917A59B07CA
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com