Re New Trump Deportation Rules

["Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>]

As I said I present all sides


Begin forwarded message:

> From: "RJR-rjriley" <rjr () rjriley com>
> Date: February 22, 2017 at 4:49:30 PM EST
> To: <dave () farber net>
> Subject: RE: [IP] New Trump Deportation Rules
>
> There is no reason that we cannot speed up legit immigration, from more desirable sources.  Also, we can issue work 
> permits without an easy path to citizenship.  We also need to change birthright citizenship to one requiring one 
> parent to be a citizen or to be naturalized before their child turns 18, and then confer citizenship to the child.
>  
> For example, there are lots of people in Europe, well educated, with desirable skills who would love to flee the 
> problems created by Muslims who refuse to assimilate.
>  
> There is no innate right to be Allowed into America.
>  
> Ronald J Riley
>  
> From: Dave Farber [mailto:farber () gmail com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 1:31 PM
> To: ip
> Subject: [IP] New Trump Deportation Rules
>  
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: "Evers Ridgely C." <rce () evers org>
> > Date: February 22, 2017 at 1:17:57 PM EST
> > To: Farber David <dave () farber net>
> > Subject: New Trump Deportation Rules
> >
> > Dave,
> >  
> > For IP if you wish.
> >  
> > New Trump Deportation Rules Allow Far More Expulsions
> >  
> > This is remarkably (terrifyingly?) sweeping in its construct.  From the actual order (italics mine):
> >  
> > Department personnel should prioritize removable aliens who:
> > (1) have been convicted of any criminal offense; 
> > (2) have been charged with any criminal offense that has not been resolved;
> > (3) have committed acts which constitute a chargeable criminal offense;
> > (4) have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter before a governmental 
> > agency;
> > (5) have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits;
> > (6) are subject to a final order of removal but have not complied with their legal obligation to depart the United 
> > States; or
> > (7) in the judgment of an immigration officer, otherwise pose a risk to public safety or national security.
> > The Director of ICE, the Commissioner of CBP, and the Director of USCIS may, as they determine is appropriate, issue 
> > further guidance to allocate appropriate resources to prioritize enforcement activities within these categories - 
> > for example, by prioritizing enforcement activities against removable aliens who are convicted felons or who are 
> > involved in gang activity or drug trafficking.
> > Note that being in the US without permission is a "chargeable criminal offense" (condition #3)  Basically, 
> > therefore, this tasks ICE with kicking out pretty much everyone who is undocumented, with the exception of DREAMers.
> >  
> > I live in an agricultural area, where the vast majority of workers are immigrants, mostly undocumented.  Many have 
> > children born in the US, who have US citizenship but not Mexican citizenship (for example), so the children cannot 
> > just "go to Mexico."
> >  
> > The families are terrified that they will be separated – and not without evidence to support that fear.  We know 
> > people who, in the past two weeks, have had a parent targeted, arrested, and deported without hearing.
> >  
> > –Ridge
>
> Archives | Modify Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now
>
>  
>
>
>                                               
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
> www.avast.com



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20170222165328:5579DE22-F949-11E6-8ED7-81381F665A1B
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com