Dueling editorials on Viacom v Google (Copyright Cartel v the Internet)

[Dave Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Dan Gillmor <dan () gillmor com>
> Date: June 30, 2010 9:07:12 PM EDT
> To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
> Subject: Dueling editorials on Viacom v Google (Copyright Cartel v the Internet)

> The Los Angeles Times has a smart editorial, clearly written by someone who understands technology and copyright, 
> about the Viacom-Google decision:
>
> http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-youtube-20100629,0,2290414.story
>
> But the San Francisco Chronicle has an editorial that's laughably flabby, clearly written by someone who knows a bit 
> about copyright and technology and is ardently trying to turn back the clock:
>
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/06/27/EDF11E4FUV.DTL
>
> My take (at Salon):
>
> http://www.salon.com/technology/dan_gillmor/2010/06/24/viacom_loses_free_speech_wins



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com