Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Steganography via VoIP...
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:29:31 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Ross Stapleton-Gray <ross () stapleton-gray com> Date: February 16, 2010 7:07:56 PM EST To: dave () farber net, Stan Hanks <stan () colventures com> Subject: Re: [IP] Steganography via VoIP... At 02:53 PM 2/16/2010, Stan Hanks <stan () colventures com> wrote:
Given the nature of things, it was only a matter of time.
...
Now steganography has entered a new era, with stupendously greater potential for mischief. With the latest techniques, the limitations on the length of the message have basically been removed.
Probably best to think of this as, "It's now trivial for two parties A & B to pass information surreptitiously, almost anywhere in the world," and move on, rather than focus on the salacious possibilities of using the Net to coordinate illicit sex, or to distribute maps for bombings. As someone who's (sadly realizing how long he's been) following IT, there was a time when moving a few bits around to all the appropriate parties was hard. Dave and many others will remember that the Soviet Union used to broadcast Morse code radio messages out to... unknown recipients. Well, jeez, the number of bits that might be embedded in the spam alone I get from places like Sverdlovsk or Magadan these days... More interesting to me is the idea of remote control, e.g., someone using cell phone-grade connectivity to guide an explosives-laden UAV or vehicle bomb into any of many attractive targets. When we have multi-megabits to the handset, you've got a nice channel for a video guidance system. (The all the autonomous vehicle research will eventually obsolete even needing that.) And that tells me that we ought to fix other things, e.g., addressing the fundamental issues that cause people to stage such attacks in the first place, desensitizing populations to rare and relatively minor threats (rather than inflating every possible threat), and lessening the attractiveness of some targets (we're moving gigabits a second everywhere on the planet... why do we still require hundreds of legislators to convene in the same room every day?). Ross ---- Ross Stapleton-Gray, Ph.D. Stapleton-Gray & Associates, Inc. http://www.stapleton-gray.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Steganography via VoIP... David Farber (Feb 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Steganography via VoIP... David Farber (Feb 16)
- Re: Steganography via VoIP... Dave Farber (Feb 17)
- Re: Steganography via VoIP... Dave Farber (Feb 17)