Interesting People mailing list archives

An issue for IP -- public safety on-scene communication


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:45:50 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: David Josephson <dlj04 () josephson com>
Date: September 11, 2009 4:10:12 PM EDT
To: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: An issue for IP

Dave,

This is an issue that might interest some of the people on IP. Several firefighters have already died as a proximate result of poor decisions made by the communications public safety establishment and the FCC, and it is slated to get worse rather than better.

Traditionally, public safety on-scene communications have been accomplished with FM analog radios that take about 20 kHz of bandwidth to operate. In good conditions they achieve intelligibility ratings around 90% and people have learned to live with them. The demands for data services and trunking protocols (that enable wide-area coverage of dozens or hundreds of channels at once through a central infrastructure) have grown far more rapidly than has the available bandwidth, so the FCC has gone along with proposals from major equipment manufacturers to make the existing channels narrower and to mandate migration to "narrowband." By 2013, all public and private two- way systems in the most commonly used bands will reduce their bandwidth by about half. Many have seen this as a mandate for transition to digital radios rather than narrowband analog, and the industry has adopted a standard for this that uses a lossy speech codec for the voice channel. The standard in the USA is called Project 25 or P25, and Phase I includes a proprietary sole-source multiband excitation speech coder, initially developed at MIT, that works well in tests despite being given only 4400 bps for the voice channel. Speech quality is compromised but intelligibility remains at 85 to 90%. Unfortunately, in the presence of noise, intelligibility degrades severely, and fires and emergency scenes are not often quiet. A summary of the tests that have been done, with links to the data, can be found at http://www.iafc.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=719

Phase II of P25 envisions providing only 2400 bps for the speech signal using an AMBE codec, also proprietary and sole-source. According to the NTIA tests, these codecs fail in the presence of noises like fire engine pumps, nozzles and breathing apparatus alarms.

Work is proceeding on cleaning up the audio presented to the codec so that it has a chance of being intelligible in the presence of high levels of background noise. I am holding a workshop at the Audio Engineering Society's 127th convention in New York in October, featuring DJ Atkinson of NTIA's Institute for Telecommunication Sciences (who did some of the research linked from the IAFC page above). We will be focusing on how to improve the microphone technology to make the codec's job easier, but we are chipping away at only the part of the iceberg that's visible. See http://www.aes.org/events/127 for details.

There is a huge push from Homeland Security and other agencies to centralize public safety radio systems, which requires lots of new bandwidth. Many equipment vendors, under strong pressure from low cost foreign suppliers, are very interested in a mandate to use only their equipment. All of this is just an economic issue if everything works. Unfortunately, in many cases it doesn't work, and emergency responders find their radios unusable, and safety-of-life-critical messages get lost. The issue needs more public discussion and thinking about other compromises that can be made in order to achieve the information bandwidth requirements that users want -- without compromising the critical usability of the systems.

Hope this is of interest to you and yours...

Regards

David Josephson
Josephson Engineering, Inc.
Audio Engineering Society Technical Council







-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: