Interesting People mailing list archives
Shovel-ready broadband stimulus
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:55:16 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "Bob Frankston" <Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com> Date: May 7, 2009 12:08:55 PM EDT To: <dave () farber net>, "'ip'" <ip () v2 listbox com> Cc: "'Dewayne Hendricks'" <dewayne () warpspeed com> Subject: RE: [IP] Shovel-ready broadband stimulusWhy am I not surprised that economists claim that they can solve any problem by holding an auction according to rules they define? And bureaucrats say they can act as soon as they get measurements (even if they are meaningless)? And same-old business just see another revenue source. We’ve seen this show before and we’re in reruns.
I’d like to shift the focus to liberating the value in the infrastructure rather than leaving it locked into the same-old “value chain” we call telecom services.
-----Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 11:15 To: ip Subject: [IP] Shovel-ready broadband stimulus Begin forwarded message: From: dewayne () warpspeed com (Dewayne Hendricks) Date: May 6, 2009 2:21:54 PM EDT To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <xyzzy () warpspeed com> Subject: [Dewayne-Net] Shovel-ready broadband stimulus SHOVEL-READY BROADBAND STIMULUS [Commentary] The $7.2 billion broadband stimulus will not achieve what it advertises for the US economy. Firms that had been building rural broadband networks have reportedly halted operations, circling back to Washington. Ultimately, the $7.2bn will be awarded in "beauty contests," where bureaucrats examine competing proposals and make their picks based on their values, mood, and whim. A group of 71 economists expert in telecommunications policy, including two Nobel Laureates (and this author), have urged a different approach, "reverse auctions." The government would state its performance criteria and then take bids, selecting the lowest price offers. The proposal has only a remote chance of being adopted because it is both transparent and economical. Having to make goals objective and explicit takes the discretionary political fun away. And assigning rights by competitive bidding is like having a fraternity party without any beer at all. <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/af900dd0-3699-11de-af40-00144feabdc0.html> RSS Feed: <http://www.warpspeed.com/wordpress> ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Shovel-ready broadband stimulus David Farber (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Shovel-ready broadband stimulus David Farber (May 07)
- Re: Shovel-ready broadband stimulus David Farber (May 07)
- Re: Shovel-ready broadband stimulus David Farber (May 07)
- Re: Shovel-ready broadband stimulus David Farber (May 11)