Interesting People mailing list archives

Re: Congress Should Delay the Digital TV Transition


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:13:08 -0500



Begin forwarded message:

From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com>
Date: January 10, 2009 11:15:41 AM EST
To: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Re: [IP] WORTH READING Congress Should Delay the Digital TV Transition


Dave,

By the way, though I didn't mention this in my essay a couple of days
ago urging DTV transition delay, it appears that there may be some DTV
converter price gouging going on now so close to the current analog
cutoff date.  At local stores here in L.A., I've seen that the exact
same converters that were available for *free* a couple of months ago
(that is, $40, minus the $40 coupon) are now priced $20 higher!  Same
box, same store.  Only difference -- the deadline looms.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren
Co-Founder, PFIR
  - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
Co-Founder, NNSquad
  - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org
Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com
Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com

  - - -

On 01/10 04:55, David Farber wrote:


Begin forwarded message:

From: "Bruce Kushnick" <bruce () newnetworks com>
Date: January 9, 2009 11:05:44 PM EST
To: <dave () farber net>
Subject: RE: [IP] Congress Should Delay the Digital TV Transition




<The available DTV converters are just plain confusing to many viewers,
<especially folks who have been watching the same old TVs with "rabbit
ear"
<antennas for ages.  Even if they get everything hooked up right, many
<people will find that their reception under the digital regime is
<unacceptable due to coverage variations and differing antenna
requirements.



We wrote an article about why there should be a delay... The real secret
--
the antenna configurations were not designed for digital signals and in
whole strips of America's rural fringe areas are going to lose signals
even
with new antennas.

We wrote an article
http://www.niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=ask_this.view&askthisid=0
0383

Tom Allibone of Teletruth actually went to customers' homes in Hunterdon county, NJ to do real world testing --- The result was -- 100% lost New
York
channels, even though they are in the NY City MSA

We did a separate report on the survey.
http://www.newnetworks.com/dtvreport.htm


So customers go out, buy the box, find it doesn't work, then goes back
to
the store who has no idea about an antenna -- and even those who bought
new
antennas --- or new TVs are not guaranteed they will work.

According to the original documents, the NTIA claimed it would work with
existing technology -- the rabbit ears... with no real world testing.

And, then there's the question of, well, collusion. Every media outlet
has
been essentially using the materials supplied by the NTIA, FCC, and NAB
--
and virtually no programming even mentioned that the person may need a
new
antenna until December 2008. And, most programming today does not
mention
the antenna issue.

So, in the middle of a winter snowstorm, seniors go on the roofs of
their
houses to attempt to adjust an antenna that can't be adjusted --- and
spend
hundreds more on antennas that they really don't have the money to spend
on
-- then the cable companies comes over and raises their left eyebrow --
have
I got a deal for you...

Should we be talking TV-Lifeline?

B.







-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: