Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: More Silliness: Congressman Wants to Ban "Silent" Cell Phone Cameras
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:59:30 -0500
remember the rule against selling scanner that detect police band, well it did not work either djf
Begin forwarded message: From: Thomas Shaddack <shaddack () shaddack twibright com> Date: January 29, 2009 2:15:41 PM EST To: David Farber <dave () farber net>Subject: Re: [IP] More Silliness: Congressman Wants to Ban "Silent" Cell Phone Cameras
Import (of a GSM phone) from Europe. Firmware update with a minor alteration. A piece of a thin enameled wire, on/off beeper switch in the battery compartment. Just three of the many possible ways. The "bad guys" will stay unaffected. The "good guys" will lose the ability to e.g. covertly document police misconduct.
Begin forwarded message: From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Date: January 29, 2009 12:41:20 PM EST To: dave () farber netSubject: More Silliness: Congressman Wants to Ban "Silent" Cell Phone CamerasMore Silliness: Congressman Wants to Ban "Silent" Cell Phone Camerashttp://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000500.html Greetings. As if there weren't enough truly important issues to worry about, a U.S. Congressman has introduced the Camera Phone Predator Alert Act (CPPAA) -- which would require all cell phones to make an audible sound when snapping a photo ( http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=6750825 ). There's no evidence that illicit "underskirting" photography is a significant problem outside of Japan and Korea, and the law would only apply to phone cameras, not the vast range of other camera devices available, many of which are far smaller and more easily used surreptitiously than a cell phone. And as for the vast number of situations where cell phones are used legitimately to take photos where a notification sound would be disruptive -- even dangerous -- well, better not to mention those since they get in the way of the fantasy on which the CPPAA is predicated. Also, given that many cell phones can now shoot video as well as still photos, I wonder if this same Congressman would propose that all video camera devices beep constantly when in video record mode -- just like trucks backing up? That'll do wonders for the audio tracks, eh? Never let the facts and reality get in the way of political grandstanding. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- More Silliness: Congressman Wants to Ban "Silent" Cell Phone Cameras David Farber (Jan 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: More Silliness: Congressman Wants to Ban "Silent" Cell Phone Cameras David Farber (Jan 29)
- Re: More Silliness: Congressman Wants to Ban "Silent" Cell Phone Cameras David Farber (Jan 29)