Interesting People mailing list archives

Re: Professor Main Target of Assault on Twitter - NYTimes.com


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 11:02:08 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: Tom Gray <tom_gray_grc () yahoo com>
Date: August 9, 2009 7:54:36 AM EDT
To: dave () farber net, tom_gray_grc () yahoo com
Subject: Re: [IP] Re: Professor Main Target of Assault on Twitter - NYTimes.com


A major problem with the Internet identified in the IETF VoIP work is that the Internet architecture commonly does not associate costs with benefits. Some companies have to bear the cost whaler others reap the benefits. Google runs a business providing free video service while the carries have to bear the cost of increased bandwidth. VoIP would work much better if ISP NATS functioned in awareness of the VoIP protocols such as SIP. However if the ISP receives no direct nonfat from VoIP services then their is only a slight and indirect incentive for it to invest in technology to enable VoIP.

In Canada, there was an historic agreement in the 18th century called the Crows Nest Pass agreement. The railroad companies would obtain rights of way if they agreed to carry wheat at a fixed rate. The Crow's Nest Pass agreement fixed this at half a cent per ton-mile. This became famous and farmers saw it as their right. It was a fair rate in the 19th century but in he 20th, it did not cover the costs. The railroads would do anything to not carry wheat. They certainly did not invest in capacity. The farmers kept complaining to government and the government kept ordering the railroads to honor their agreement but half a cent per ton-mile guaranteed that there would be no capacity to haul wheat. Eventually reality set in and a fair rate was set. The farmers whose interest it is to have an ample wheat haulage capacity can now be responsible for financing it through fair rates. As a result it is there.

Railroad history is often used to illustrate commentary of the Interet. The Crow's NEst Pass agreement is anothr apt illustration. If users wat service then they have to ensure that they are responsible for the cost. T

--- On Sun, 8/9/09, David Farber <dave () farber net> wrote:

From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: [IP] Re: Professor Main Target of Assault on Twitter - NYTimes.com
To: "ip" <ip () v2 listbox com>
Received: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 5:40 AM


Begin forwarded message:

From: Dan Lynch <dan () lynch com>
Date: August 8, 2009 6:23:56 PM EDT
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Re: [IP] Professor Main Target of Assault on
Twitter - NYTimes.com

This s**t has to be stopped.  It is a deep
infrastructure problem.  Some class of suppliers must
be making money off of the weaknesses.  Anybody out
there have a prescription for the cure?

Dan



On 8/8/09 1:48 PM, "Dave Farber" <dave () farber net>
wrote:


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/08/technology/internet/08twitter.html?hp


    Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now>
<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/>
<http://www.listbox.com>




Tel. 707-967-0203   Cell  650-776-7313
My assistant is Dori Kirk   Tel.
707-255-7094  dori () lynch com




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com



     __________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now
http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: