Interesting People mailing list archives

The crisis caused by bankers may take us to the edge of bankruptcy (Ireland)


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:44:32 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: "Ronald J Riley \(RJR-com\)" <rjr () rjriley com>
Date: October 20, 2008 8:08:47 AM EDT
To: <dave () farber net>
Subject: The crisis caused by bankers may take us to the edge of bankruptcy (Ireland)

Dave,

Below is an article about the meltdown of banking from Ireland which may be of interest to IP readers.

Ronald J. Riley,


Speaking only on my own behalf.
Affiliations:
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.patentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.

http://www.independent.ie/business/world/the-crisis-caused-by-bankers-may-take-us-to-the-edge-of-bankruptcy-1499569.html

The economist's view

The crisis caused by bankers may take us to the edge of bankruptcy

By Paul Sweeney

Thursday October 16 2008

"Not only have individual financial institutions become less vulnerable to shocks from underlying risk factors, but also the financial system as a whole has become more resilient." -- Alan Greenspan in 2004

Alan Greenspan, the US financial regulator was known as "the oracle." He could do no wrong because so many powerful people were making so much money. Yet some economists were warning of the dangers of the lack of regulation. The ultimate impact of his repeated reassurances was to inflate the bubble even further and exacerbate the 2008 crash.

In April 2008, the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (ICTU) published an in-depth analysis of top executive pay, 'Narrowing the Pay Gap', and the manner in which it had lost all touch with reality.

We chose to open our publication with a rather different quote from Nobel economist Joe Stiglitz: "Anybody who believes the banks know what they're doing has to have their heads examined. Clearly, unfettered markets have led us to this downturn and to enormous social problems."

He was speaking over six months before Wall Street imploded. It is now clear that the financial crisis will fundamentally change politics. If we have learned anything in recent weeks, it is that markets are seldom "free", that they are man-made institutions and are most certainly not self-regulating. Just as the collapse of the Berlin Wall signalled the end of Communism, so the collapse of Wall Street (the Wall was actually removed in 1699) has signalled the collapse of neo- conservative economics.

It was obvious that a financial crisis was looming. On 30th November 2007, ICTU, with other international unions, made presentations to the OECD at ambassador level, arguing that OECD governments must "address the lack of adequate regulation of global capital markets".

The Reagan/Thatcher ideology, as outlined by Milton Friedman and Fred von Hayek, advocated low taxes, small government, market liberalisation and a programme of deregulation and privatisation. It crashed to earth last month, brought down by its own internal contradictions.

State regulation

As Keynes argued 72 years ago, state regulation -- "interference" in the market -- is a prerequisite for any functioning and sustainable modern economy. The degree of that regulation is what politics is about. It is an irony that will not be lost on history that George Bush has nationalised more of the US economy than Lenin did of Russia's.

The free market has been stood on its head and a perverse form of "state socialism" has become the new ideology of the elites. Just as it was said that "taxes are for the little people", in the twilight of the era of unregulated business, the public sector bails out the banks and "the free market is for the little people".

The worrying fact is that it is clear that the authorities still do not know what to do. The Government has its fingers crossed. It hopes it will get away with the blanket bank guarantees and that they won't be called in. It is afraid to buy shares directly as it might look like socialism even though this may get a real return for taxpayers. It refuses to challenge the culprits. Regrettably, the current rescue package also ensures that the property developers are safeguarded at public expense.

The behaviour of central banks demonstrates a clear case of "regulatory capture" where the banks "captured" the regulators. This occurred because the myth of the free, self-regulating market had become so pervasive that even the regulators themselves doubted the necessity of their own roles. And so they slept! Ireland's Financial Regulator acted in stark contrast to the Spanish regulator which did not indulge Spanish banks -- with the result that they are now amongst the strongest in the EU.

In Europe, there is still is no financial regulator in the Single Market, or even in the euro zone, partly because the Commissioner in charge, Charlie McCreevy, is ideologically opposed to most regulation and still believes that markets are free.

The correct solution for Ireland would be to a) take shares in the banks; b) but only in viable banks -- let the weak ones fail; c) take on board representation for oversight; d) ensure, as a quid pro quo, that the executives, who brought us the chaos with frenzied property lending, resign; e) insist on curbs on excessive remuneration; f) disallow dividends for the period of state "interference"; and g) re- regulate the big accounting firms which vouched that the banks were sound.

For years, ICTU argued against inflating the property bubble -- which is at the root of the Irish financial crisis -- with huge taxpayers' subsidies. While a small number of other economists, some academics, the ESRI, and at least one government economic advisory body, were advising caution around the property market, parts of the media gave the financial sector economists, whose job it is to puff up the market, extraordinary access.

Products

These financial sector economists use media comment to market financial products, loans, "income protection" products and private pensions. They helped fuel the property bubble.

They are obsessed with public sector reform, but ignored the need for private sector reform, especially in their own houses. While there are areas of the public sector which are inefficient, these are nothing in comparison to the size of the crisis caused by the private sector bankers. It may yet lead this country to the edge of bankruptcy. The false paradigm that "private sector good; public sector bad" should be truly redundant now. This is underlined by the gross incompetence of the banking system which is the artery of the economy.

It is the public sector, the taxpayer, which has had to come to the rescue. The strong interdependence between the public and private sectors must be recognised, and be developed into a robust model of dynamism for the economy and society.

Private sector reform, which is being initiated with these bailouts, must result in private business which is less private, more transparent and more accountable, more responsible to employees, to the environment and to society. Yet in spite of the growing recognition of the need for more openness, the Government is planning to reduce financial disclosure by companies in Ireland, under a proposal currently with Tanaiste Mary Coughlan's department.

When the Government finally wakes up to what is to be done, we will need sceptical market economists to take over the Department of Finance, all state regulators, and in Government itself to deliver the new public/private paradigm.

At the EU level, a strong financial regulator must be established. In addition, a new system of market regulation, a new Bretton Woods-style agreement of global governance, should be implemented. We have had partial globalisation, of markets and profits, but not of taxation and regulation. We also need a small tax on financial transactions.

If our political leaders fail to comprehend the shift that has occurred in the economy and how it should change their politics, then we will have a prolonged recession and further crises.

- Paul Sweeney





-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: