Interesting People mailing list archives

Re: Comcast traffic shaping enhancements


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:20:21 -0700


________________________________________
From: Bob Frankston [bob37-2 () bobf frankston com]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 10:49 AM
To: David Farber; 'ip'
Cc: nnsquad () nnsquad org
Subject: RE: [IP] Comcast traffic shaping enhancements

This reminds of QoS in trying to find a solution for a particular mode of
usage within a given network capacity. What is missing is any hint of
increasing capacity and that may be a serious limitation in Comcast's view
of the world. It's acting as if Bit Torrent is the problem rather than being
a symptom of the inability to second-guess application needs.


-----Original Message-----
From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 08:24
To: ip
Subject: [IP] Comcast traffic shaping enhancements


________________________________________
From: Richard Bennett [richard () bennett com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:47 PM
To: David Farber
Subject: Comcast traffic shaping enhancements

Dave -

For IP if you wish.

I talked to Comcast's CTO, Tony Werner, on the enhancements to their
traffic shaping system they announced today. In a nutshell, they're
going to stop application-centric RST injection, and use the scheduling
mechanism in the DOCSIS CMTS instead. I've done a blog post on it:

http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/new-and-improved-traff
ic-shaping/

IETF purists should rejoice, of course.

Cheers,

RB

--
Richard Bennett


-------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


-------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: