RIAA wins its first piracy trial

[David Farber <dfarber () cs cmu edu>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Richard Forno <rforno () infowarrior org>
Date: October 4, 2007 9:39:47 PM EDT
To: Infowarrior List <infowarrior () attrition org>
Cc: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: RIAA wins its first piracy trial

Woman Faces The Music, Loses Download Case
Jury Finds Minn. Woman Violated Copyright Law, Orders Her To Pay Record
Companies $220K

Comments Comments60

DULUTH, Minn., Oct. 4, 2007

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/04/national/main3330186.shtml

(AP) The recording industry won a key fight Thursday against illegal  
music
downloading when a federal jury found a Minnesota woman shared  
copyrighted
music online and levied $222,000 in damages against her.

Jurors ordered Jammie Thomas, 30, to pay the six record companies  
that sued
her $9,250 for each of 24 songs they focused on in the case. They had
alleged she shared 1,702 songs online in violation of their copyrights.

Thomas and her attorney, Brian Toder, declined comment as they left the
courthouse. Jurors also left without commenting.

"This does send a message, I hope, that downloading and distributing our
recordings is not OK," said Richard Gabriel, the lead attorney for  
the music
companies.

In the first such lawsuit to go to trial, six record companies accused
Thomas of downloading the songs without permission and offering them  
online
through a Kazaa file-sharing account. Thomas denied wrongdoing and  
testified
that she didn't have a Kazaa account.

Record companies have filed some 26,000 lawsuits since 2003 over
file-sharing, which has hurt sales because it allows people to get  
music for
free instead of paying for recordings in stores. Many other  
defendants have
settled by paying the companies a few thousand dollars.

We think we're in for a long haul in terms of establishing that music  
has
value, that music is property, and that property has to be respected.
Cathy Sherman, RIAA President
The RIAA says the lawsuits have mitigated illegal sharing, even  
though music
file-sharing is rising overall. The group says the number of  
households that
have used file-sharing programs to download music has risen from 6.9  
million
monthly in April 2003, before the lawsuits began, to 7.8 million in  
March
2007.

During the three-day trial, record companies presented evidence they  
said
showed the copyrighted songs were offered by a Kazaa user under the name
"tereastarr." Their witnesses, including officials from an Internet  
provider
and a security firm, testified that the Internet address used by
"tereastarr" belonged to Thomas.

Toder had argued at closing that record companies never proved that  
"Jammie
Thomas, a human being, got on her keyboard and sent out these things."

"We don't know what happened," Toder told jurors. "All we know is that
Jammie Thomas didn't do this."

Gabriel called that defense "misdirection, red herrings, smoke and  
mirrors."

He told jurors a verdict against Thomas would send a message to other
illegal downloaders.

"I only ask that you consider that the need for deterrence here is  
great,"
he said.

Copyright law sets a damage range of $750 to $30,000 per  
infringement, or up
to $150,000 if the violation was "willful." Jurors ruled that Thomas'
infringement was willful, but awarded damages in a middle range.

Before the verdict, an official with an industry trade group said he was
surprised it had taken so long for one of the industry's lawsuits  
against
individual downloaders to come to trial.

Illegal downloads have "become business as usual, nobody really  
thinks about
it," said Cary Sherman, president of the Recording Industry  
Association of
America, which coordinates the lawsuits. "This case has put it back  
in the
news. Win or lose, people will understand that we are out there  
trying to
protect our rights."

Thomas' testimony was complicated by the fact that she had replaced her
computer's hard drive after the sharing was alleged to have taken  
place -
and later than she said in a deposition before trial.

The hard drive in question was not presented at trial by either party,
though Thomas used her new one to show the jury how fast it copies songs
from CDs. That was an effort to counter an industry witness's  
assertion that
the songs on the old drive got their too fast to have come from CDs she
owned - and therefore must have been downloaded illegally.

Record companies said Thomas was sent an instant message in February  
2005,
warning her that she was violating copyright law. Her hard drive was
replaced the following month, not in 2004, as she said in the  
deposition.

The record companies involved in the lawsuit are Sony BMG, Arista  
Records
LLC, Interscope Records, UMG Recordings Inc., Capitol Records Inc. and
Warner Bros. Records Inc.

© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may  
not be
published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.




-------------------------------------------
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com