Interesting People mailing list archives
NYT on Audio/Video "Fingerprinting" (and a comment)
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:58:30 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Date: February 19, 2007 2:08:36 AM EST To: dave () farber net Cc: lauren () vortex com Subject: NYT on Audio/Video "Fingerprinting" (and a comment) Dave, This new NY Times story: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/technology/19video.html gives a good summary of activities in the content control fingerprinting technology arena. I'd like to emphasize one point that is mentioned in the article. Efforts to control content in this manner will push offending material to sites that are not controlled. I would take this analysis a step further. Such efforts will inevitably drive piracy more deeply underground into more and more obscured forms, which will not be detectable by Web spiders or even ISP-installed filtering mechanisms. In fact, even determining the actual level of piracy will be increasingly difficult under such a scenario. Is an encrypted stream of bits a VoIP flow, a database transfer, a videoconference, or a pirated music video? True, various algorithms can be used to make assumptions, but there will be a range of countermeasures to these as well. I'm on record as being supportive of the concept of non-abusive intellectual property rights. But that doesn't change the realities of digitization, encryption, and the Internet, with which I suspect many people still haven't come to terms. These are the same realities that doom DRM in the long run. Bits are bits. In the end, we're likely to be faced with something of a binary decision -- no pun intended. We can either restrict Internet access and low-level applications to an extent that cripples the Net's usefulness and economic viability, or we can accept the fact that some existing content-related business models will not survive in the new technological world. Rather than waiting for these models to go splat against the wall sometime in the future, ultimately despite high-tech holding actions (like content fingerprinting), we might wish to start negotiating a framework for intellectual property that is based on principles that are more likely to survive. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, IOIC - International Open Internet Coalition - http://www.ioic.net Founder, CIFIP - California Initiative For Internet Privacy - http://www.cifip.org Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com DayThink: http://daythink.vortex.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/@now Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- NYT on Audio/Video "Fingerprinting" (and a comment) David Farber (Feb 19)