Interesting People mailing list archives
brilliant -- Re: Google Dreams Big
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:35:09 -0500
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: brilliant -- Re: [IP] Google Dreams Big Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:26:45 -0800 From: Ed Gerck <egerck () safevote com> To: dave () farber net CC: ip () v2 listbox com References: <440B49BE.1010606 () farber net> Dave: Hi! For IP if you wish.
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Google Dreams Big Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:10:13 -0500 From: Randall <rvh40 () insightbb com>
...
An important implication of this theme is that we can make your online copy more secure than it would be on your own machine.
...
Another important implication of this theme is that storing 100% of a user's data makes each piece of data more valuable
Google likes to throw ideas out there, to use the market as their computing device for what works. However, by the reasons (*) listed below (or just by #7 and their ongoing fight against a DoJ subpoena), google already knows that this one will not fly. Why do this, then? They might be just trying to raise market awareness for the problems of such approach. Even though Microsoft already had to pull the plug on a very similar program (google "hailstorm microsoft"), Microsoft is still in an ideal situation to try it again and better. Which (given users' notorious naivete') would kill a large market segment for google's search -- namely, every Internet user. Of course, google's search appliance for enterprises (and later, a more affordable gadget for the masses) would not have these problems... Brilliant preventive move by google, it seems, as it looks for options -- and time -- to better place its technology. Cheers, Ed Gerck (*) What google proposes is a direct contradiction, for several reasons: (1) Because you *still* have your local copy, the online copy becomes an _additional_ risk. Risk MUST increase with the added online copy. (2) Even if the online copy is encrypted (best case) with a key that google does NOT have, the file may still be attacked and decrypted by a variety of methods -- some of them not even cryptographically or computationally limited. (3) Losing physical control of your data (by placing a copy under google's control) cannot be recalled. It's a final revocation of your sole control rights. (4) Creates a single point of failure. (5) The more valuable your data becomes, it also becomes a more valuable target. (6) Goes agains usual confidentiality principles, including "need to know" and "least privilege". (7) Either contradicts legal requirements for confidentiality or makes google legally liable for safekeeping everyone's data against any disclosure risk (including disclosure that is legally mandated, which is always a risk to comply because any order can be potentially disputable). ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- brilliant -- Re: Google Dreams Big David Farber (Mar 06)