Interesting People mailing list archives
more on China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains]
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:20:49 -0500
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [IP] China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:42:59 -0800 From: Travis Kalanick <travis () redswoosh net> To: dave () farber net CC: mgeist () pobox com Michael, I would like to address your reference to the Internet "breaking" due to a secondary root, as I am convinced the situation is not so bleak. If an ISP decides to support parallel roots and both roots support the same extensions, it would be trivial to set up a rule which gives priority to one yahoo.com (determined by one root), over another yahoo.com (determined by another root). My guess is that the ISP that supported two roots would make a default decision on behalf of the user, and if the user didn't like the decision there would be a number of easy to use software kits available to the consumer that would set the hosts file to the desired IP addresses--a simple tool could/might simply be bundled with Windows/Linux/MacOS distributions. If you're worried about censorship and access regarding China's 110MM users, the DNS change does little to change the situation. China has been filtering Internet content and redirecting "dangerous" requests w/o a secondary root for years. More broadly, ISPs have the ability to censor, filter and redirect without a secondary root. The only things to stop them are the values, laws, and enforcement under which they operate. Travis -----Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:03 AM To: ip () v2 listbox com Subject: [IP] China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Geist <mgeist () pobox com> Date: February 28, 2006 9:24:09 AM EST To: dave () farber net Subject: China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains Dave, China is preparing to launch what appears to be an alternate root. Starting tomorrow, they will establish four country-code domains. In addition to the current dot-cn, they will offer Chinese character versions of dot-China, dot-net, and dot-com. As one article puts it, this "means Internet users don't have to surf the Web via the servers under the management of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) of the United States." Coverage from China is at http://english.people.com.cn/200602/28/eng20060228_246712.html I've got some quick commentary at <http://michaelgeist.ca/component/option,com_content/task,view/id, 1130/Itemid,85/nsub,/> which includes: "The alternate root has always lurked in the background as a possibility that would force everyone to rethink their positions since it would enable a single country (or group of countries) to effectively pack up their bags and start a new game. The U.S. control would accordingly prove illusory since a new domain name system situated elsewhere would be subject to its own rules. While the two could theoretically co-exist by having ISPs simply recognize both roots, the system could "break" if both roots contained identical extensions. In other words, one root can have dot-com and other other can have dot-corp, but they can't both have dot-com. It is with that background in mind that people need to think about a press release issued yesterday in China announcing a revamping of its Internet domain name system. Starting tomorrow, China's Ministry of Information Industry plans to begin offering four country-code domains. In addition to the dot-cn country code domain, three new Chinese character domains are on the way: dot-China, dot-net, and dot- com. As the People's Daily Online notes this "means Internet users don't have to surf the Web via the servers under the management of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) of the United States." In other words, the Chinese Internet becomes a reality tomorrow. With it, the rules of the game may change as 110 million Internet users will suddenly have access to a competing dot-com (albeit in a different character set) and will no longer rely exclusively on ICANN for the resolution of Internet domain name queries. This change was probably inevitable regardless of the status of ICANN, however, the U.S. position can't possibly have helped matters. Indeed, some might note that while Congress has been criticizing U.S. companies for cooperating with Chinese law enforcement and thereby harming Internet freedoms, those same Congressional leaders may have done the same by refusing to even consider surrendering some control over the Internet root to the international community and thereby opening the door to an alternate root that could prove even worse from a freedom perspective. This week's announcement certainly doesn't mark the end of a global interoperable Internet. It does move one step further toward that path since in Internet governance terms, the credible threat is now real." MG -- ********************************************************************** Professor Michael A. Geist Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law 57 Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5 Tel: 613-562-5800, x3319 Fax: 613-562-5124 mgeist () pobox com http://www.michaelgeist.ca ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as travis () redswoosh net To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains] Dave Farber (Feb 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains] Dave Farber (Feb 28)