Interesting People mailing list archives

more on New USG Grant System Excludes Mac Users


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:44:18 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [IP] more on New USG Grant System Excludes Mac Users
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:35:48 -0500
From: Daniel Weitzner <djweitzner () csail mit edu>
To: dave () farber net
CC: ip () v2 listbox com
References: <43F0BE1B.8060102 () farber net>

[for IP if you like]

Gene is, of course, correct. This is not the first time that the US
Government has tried to use common, but not standard technologies for
important government services. IPers may remember that in August 2005
the Copyright Office announced one of it's 'web-based' registration
systems would only work with Internet Explorer. A number of IT
groups, including W3C, sent comments complaining that this unfairly
excluded many users from a government benefit to which they are
entitled:

        http://www.w3.org/2005/08/22-w3c-prereg-standards-comments.html

Six months later we still haven't heard a response from the Copyright
Office.

Danny


On Feb 13, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Dave Farber wrote:



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [IP] more on New USG Grant System Excludes Mac Users
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:04:34 -0500
From: Gene Spafford <spaf () cerias purdue edu>
To: dave () farber net
References: <43F0B795.40202 () farber net>

The real problem, of course, is that the system was apparently never
specified to be standards-compliant and vendor neutral.  If it was,
then the program management has deviated from the specs.

Scientists use Windows (certainly), but also Macs (OS 9 and OS X),
Solaris, Linux (all 20 million versions :-), HP/UX, AIX, and more.
The common thread is interoperable, vendor-neutral standards.

I have often stated in interviews that "Common does not mean
'standard.' "   That there are more Windows machines out there does
not mean that Windows is the standard.  If simple majority was the
criterion on which to base an implementation, then they should have
done the whole thing in Chinese as it is probably the most-used
language in the world.  Not to be as pejorative as this sounds, I
harken back to an article in the NY Times on 11/26/91 that had the
following lovely quote about Microsoft products vs the Mac:
"...cockroaches are far more numerous than humans, [but] ... numbers
alone do not denote a higher life form."  Numbers alone do not tell
the story that should be told!

If the site had been developed to primarily work with Macs or VMS or
DOS we should have been equally as outraged at the expenditure of
public funds effectively endorsing one system; emulation for "second
class" is not a solution.


- -------------------------------------
You are subscribed as djweitzner () csail mit edu
To manage your subscription, go to
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-
people/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD8MVyh0VyAToQeqERAuBIAJ9+Ev0KxgxZx/+hqqs4abPLczFZRgCgkF3c
XYYfwZqt6HhxuhxiT51DVbY=
=bBX1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: