Interesting People mailing list archives
From Neil Munro; This is why I love IP.
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 06:21:16 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Tom Fairlie <tfairlie () frontiernet net> Date: October 6, 2005 2:11:34 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] From Neil Munro; This is why I love IP. *yes* comment. :-) Mr. Munro's blunt opinion is as refreshing as it is misguided. A big stick is always more *effective* than walking softly, but that doesn't mean it's always *better*. He dismisses Mr. Syme's comment as some sort of utopian drivel, but simultaneously skates past an even better reason for the peace: Ireland's economic growth in the 1990s. Once Ireland invested in its economy, it was more than able to take advantage of the high-tech boom of the 1990s. Naturally, they paid the price for this participation (read, speculation) as well, but it certainly had its benefits. Once Irish youth began to notice that they could make a decent living, the desire to pick up a rifle or dish out some punishment beatings lost some of its allure. Likewise, Mr. Munro's other examples run out of gas too. The U.S. didn't exactly whip a Filipino "insurgency"; we both invaded and betrayed them after freeing them from Spanish rule. Our "victory" came at the expense of between 250,000 and 1 million Filipino lives and sent the country into decades of problems and instability--the effects of which still exist today. In Vietnam, same thing. We weren't invited, we had no grand plan, and we certainly had no exit strategy. Does evacuating from the roof of a hotel sound like a plan? Does putting a hit on Che after he had already run out of gas speak about the effectiveness of using force to quell an insurgency or simply the determination and billion-dollar funding of a U.S. organization that held a grudge? The point here is that economics often has a much greater role than either military action or diplomacy. If much of the developing world was drowning in economic opportunity, they wouldn't be weighing the option of throwing a bomb in their back seat and blowing up a police station. This is an area where the U.S. can play a great role. Why didn't we invest in Afghanistan legally and help them to build a pipeline through their country 10 years ago instead of destroying what infrastructure they had? Why haven't we been tying our purchases of Saudi Arabian crude oil to democratic reforms there instead of allowing their indirect funding of militant radical groups to continue unabated? Methinks stopping an insurgency here or there is not the problem and that there is no good answer anyhow. The real answer is in avoiding the reasons for an insurgency in the first place. For example, is fighting the insurgency in Iraq even worth it? What is the limit on time, lives, or dollars that we will place on such an effort? Is a limit valid? According to Mr. Munro, success will come only if we invest in these three areas and stay in the fight until we prevail. I hope he doesn't have to sacrifice a son or daughter to keep his petrol under 4 pounds per gallon. Tom Fairlie www.stopthebuck.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Farber" <dave () farber net> To: "Ip Ip" <ip () v2 listbox com> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 6:37 PM Subject: [IP] From Neil Munro; This is why I love IP. no comment Begin forwarded message: From: "Munro, Neil" <NMunro () nationaljournal com> Date: October 5, 2005 8:57:38 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: From Neil Munro; This is why I love IP. This is why I love IP. In response to my comment that the Brits defeated the IRA, Gordon Syme wrote that "the decommissioning of IRA weapons was brought about through peaceful means. The British did not 'defeat' the IRA, that implies they won by force. The British and Irish governments realised many years ago that the only way to end the problem was peaceful negotiation." The ability of nice people to believe that eloquence and civilized conduct trumps war is delightful, just as children's desire to believe in Santa Claus is delightful. It is certainly much more charming than belief in a flat Earth, and is somewhat ennobling. But, of course, it is not true. From space we can see the Earth is round, and with even a modest bit of intellectual effort, we can address the question 'What made the parties decide to negotiate rather than seek complete victory via a little extra violence?' As grade-school kids recognize, the answer is fear that the enemy can inflict even greater violence and pain. There is no evidence that man has evolved into sainthood. I do hope Mr. Syme and others can continue to believe in the diplomatic tooth-fairy, and that US leadership successfully balances society's need for rough-shouldered force with the natural desire for the dream of negotiated peace. Having received comments from other IP-readers, I know that some IP-readers recognize the difficulty of this task. Like I say, I just love IP. Neil Born in Dublin, Ireland. Begin forwarded message: From: Gordon Syme <gsyme () twiceasgood net> Date: October 5, 2005 5:04:24 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] more on High-tech army defeats insurgency; May I citesome examples? Professor Farber, for IP, if you wish: On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 16:35 -0400, David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message: From: "Munro, Neil" <NMunro () nationaljournal com> Date: October 4, 2005 4:04:53 PM EDT The Brits defeated the IRA this month after 25 years and roughly 4,000 deaths.
The decommissioning of IRA weapons was brought about through peaceful means. The British did not 'defeat' the IRA, that implies they won by force. The British and Irish governments realised many years ago that the only way to end the problem was peaceful negotiation. -Gordon Syme ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as nmunro () nationaljournal com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as tfairlie () frontiernet net To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ipArchives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- From Neil Munro; This is why I love IP. David Farber (Oct 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- From Neil Munro; This is why I love IP. David Farber (Oct 06)
- From Neil Munro; This is why I love IP. David Farber (Oct 06)