Interesting People mailing list archives
Michael Powell: No FCC censorship of satellite radio [fs]
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:08:40 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: Robert Lee <robertslee () verizon net> Reply-To: <robertslee () verizon net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:09:34 -0500 To: <dave () farber net> Subject: RE: [IP] Michael Powell: No FCC censorship of satellite radio [fs] I, too, think that Powell's reasoning is bizarre and if he really said that shows almost a total lack of knowledge of some basic legal and regulatory issues. On Comcast cable on any night I can watch people fornicating. I can watch hard concrete like silicone implanted breasts with jutting nipples bounce up and down on supposed erect penises. Why can I do that? Because I pay for cable. Do I pay for this content purposefully? No. It is bundled. But the deal is I pay for the service and if I don't want Comcast cable I can not pay them and not get the content. I can imagine a case in which some aggrieved party says to Comcast, don't bundle that in, have that station be a specific line item to be bought or not, but to the best of my knowledge the FCC has no more right to regulate the content of stations I pay for than some other regulatorium has the right to regulate the sexual content of a magazine I buy, or the content of a book I buy. I have the honor of having had a mother who wrote books that were banned in Boston and also by the Catholic Church (her books were on something called a B or C list---I cannot remember which). The FBI visited our house in the 1950's and removed from her bookshelves books that were illegal to buy in the United States, including Henry Miller, Justine, etc. The HUAC called her to testify and she refused. And this was a woman who was the editor of poetry for the Ladies Home Journal and wrote poems like, "How tall is Robert?--two teddy bears tall, one medium bounce of a red rubber ball." We had people marching outside our house with sandwich boards trying to get us to move out of the neighborhood. Catholic kids were not allowed to play with us. Three months later the spotlight moved from our house to that of Grace Metallious, in Boston, who had come out with something even worse, a book called Peyton Place. Six years later Metallious was dead in her early 40's, partly due to the political fallout of her celebrity. By that time we had re-bought Henry Miller books. Some twenty years ago I watched on TV a young fawning female TV reporter interview Henry Miller. She knew he was important, but not exactly why. I am sure she had never read any of his books. He said in that interview something I have never forgotten and by which I live. Interviewer: Are you a Communist? Miller: (laughing) No, I am not a Communist, don't you know. Interviewer: Well, then are you a Capitalist? Miller: (laughing even harder) No, I am not a Capitalist, don't you know. Interviewer: I don't get it. If you are not a Communist and not a Capitalist, what are you? Miller: (kindly) Well, don't you know, there is no Communism. There is no Capitalism. Interviewer: (confused) If there is no Communism and there is no Capitalism, then what is there? Miller: (kindly) There is only one system. Interviewer: What is that? Miller: Barterism. Interviewer: Barterism? Miller: Yes. Do you know what that is? Interviewer: Yes, that is when you trade one thing for another. Miller: Almost. You have it right except for one thing. Interviewer: What is that? Miller: There is only one thing to trade. Interviewer: What is that? Miller: Ourselves. We have only one thing to trade. Ourselves. All else is just details. And that is true in systems you call Capitalism and in systems you call Communism. Michael Powell is a silly man in an very unsilly position of power. To me watching the Piltdown Man (the hoax caveman) Sean Hannity tell Gore Vidal (at the least one of the intellectual figures of the last century) he is "full of crap" is more obscene that watching a nipple or two. Sean Hannity, in my mind, is the most obscene thing on my TV. When Gore Vidal asked Hannity why Hannity was calling him Gore, Hannity responded, "What should I call you then?" and Vidal said, appropriately, "How about Mr. Vidal?" And that about says it all. The regulatorium is now being run by willful, disrespectful, caustic, and sanctimonious children, who, at one moment profess a distaste for all regulation of business of any kind and the next, jump on any bandwagon they think will ingratiate themselves with the powers that be. Robert Lee -----Original Message----- From: owner-ip () v2 listbox com [mailto:owner-ip () v2 listbox com] On Behalf Of David Farber Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 9:13 AM To: Ip Subject: [IP] Michael Powell: No FCC censorship of satellite radio [fs] ------ Forwarded Message From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:15:45 -0500 To: <politech () politechbot com> Subject: [Politech] Michael Powell: No FCC censorship of satellite radio [fs] [Of course it's hardly clear that the FCC has the statutory authority to impose "indecency" restrictions on satellite radio if it wanted to, and constitutional hurdles are another reason for Powell to say this. But it's still good that he did. More broadly, the existence of two different regulatory regimes does cause an imbalance, and all else being equal, a competitive advance for satellite radio. If the imbalance ever corrects itself, I hope it'll be in the less-regulated direction rather than the Pacification of satellite. --Declan] --- http://news.com.com/FCC+chief+buoys+VoIP%2C+satellite+radio/2100-7353_3-5515 823.html?tag=nefd.top FCC chief buoys VoIP, satellite radio Published: January 6, 2005, 3:09 PM PST By David Becker Staff Writer, CNET News.com LAS VEGAS--Michael Powell had a rare bit of good news Thursday for shock jock Howard Stern, saying the government had no interest in censoring satellite radio... "I think it's a dangerous thing to start talking about extending government oversight of content to other media just to level the playing field," Powell said. [...] Broadcast radio operators have made several unsuccessful attempts to restrict satellite radio content. But Powell said the merging of media formats and the Internet and changing attitudes favor minimal oversight. [...] _______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/) ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as robertslee () verizon net To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Michael Powell: No FCC censorship of satellite radio [fs] David Farber (Jan 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Michael Powell: No FCC censorship of satellite radio [fs] David Farber (Jan 07)