Interesting People mailing list archives
Japan v. U.S. broadband: mental frameworks and buildout (was more on U.S. broadband A-OK A REAL MUST READ)
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:48:44 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: Rod Van Meter <rdv () tera ics keio ac jp> Reply-To: <rdv () tera ics keio ac jp> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:22:13 +0900 To: <dave () farber net> Subject: Japan v. U.S. broadband: mental frameworks and buildout (was more on U.S. broadband A-OK A REAL MUST READ) Dave, For IP, if you wish... There seem to be two concerns here -- there is the popular conception that building out a network in Japan (or another super-dense country, like Singapore) is cheaper than in the U.S., and that adoption rates are higher here than in the U.S. Let me address both of them -- first the buildout then the mental framework that drives adoption. It is not automatically clear to me that buildout is cheaper here (Japan). It's definitely true that the mean, median, and maximum distances to reach a user from some sort of telco office, and the distance from office to office, are shorter. It is also almost certainly true that the cost per meter to install fiber is higher here. They probably balance out to be somewhat cheaper here, but the difference is undoubtedly smaller than the conventional wisdom. Distances are shorter, but installation is more manpower-intensive, as anyone who has spent five minutes watching a Japanese construction project can attest. Equipment and materials arrive on much smaller trucks, which must wend their way through smaller, more congested streets. More security guards/flagwavers seem to be needed (or are part of Japan's "full employment"); the narrow confines complicate use of cranes and backhoes; the non-Manhattan geometry complicates underground conduits. Weather and climate have an impact; Tokyo is a somewhat wetter version of Atlanta, with work possible year-round, but in Singapore more days are going to be lost to the monsoons, and starting just a couple of hours north of Tokyo the winter snows impede work several months a year. Survey costs, soil quality, groundwater saturation and local and national regulations alter the equation. As I'm sure you remember, in the early 90s the Ministry of Post and Telecommunications actively impeded the development of ISPs such as IIJ. So, it's a complex equation to put the fiber in the ground, without even considering the higher costs of office space, the cost of backend equipment, etc. I'm sure there are folks on this list who could enumerate more issues, as well as quantify them. Besides, as others have noted, in the U.S. the buildout is now more or less complete, it's only the business issues of driving adoption. I think, in keeping with Lakoff's frames, the issue is how people *think about* the Internet. Dialup never achieved significant penetration here, so when DSL and cable modems became feasible, there was a huge opportunity, which was grabbed with both hands by Yahoo!, IIJ, JCom, and others. THEY DEFINED THE MENTAL FRAMEWORK OF THE INTERNET TO MEAN "BROADBAND". My mother-in-law has no idea what a modem is, or, for that matter, what DSL and cable modems are. The Internet, to her, is the box that sits on top of her PC and connects to the cable. There are undoubtedly millions of people like her; if you want to connect to the Internet, you go get broadband. Simple as that. No discussion; dialup and modems never enter into the equation. Self-install kits are ubiquitous; you have probably seen the Yahoo!BB people out on the streets and in train stations handing out bright red bags that contain a DSL modem and a teddy bear, in exchange for five quick minutes signing up right then and there (I suspect they skip any sort of credit check). For many other people, though, including my mother-in-law, Internet comes with the PC -- or, more correctly, Internet requires a PC. She never had a PC until she wanted to send us email (when we lived in the U.S.), so she got a PC and was sold broadband along with it. So, I think the buildout issue is a red herring, and adoption is driven partly by how people think about the Internet. Regards, --Rod ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Japan v. U.S. broadband: mental frameworks and buildout (was more on U.S. broadband A-OK A REAL MUST READ) David Farber (Jan 12)