Interesting People mailing list archives
more on ITU or ICANN - a case story from Denmark
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:25:53 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: <Robert.Shaw () itu int> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:13:55 +0100 To: <dave () farber net> Subject: RE: [IP] more on ITU or ICANN - a case story from Denmark Dave, Frode Greisen gives an account of ENUM developments in Denmark. The discussions he outlines are similar to discussions that have taken place in other countries that have implemented, or are considering implementing ENUM. As can be seen from the tutorial information at: http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/worksem/enum/index.html or the latter part of this presentation http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/presentations/2004/enum-ftra-uganda-rs.pdf or from reading any public ENUM consultation documents at national levels, there is wide agreement that ENUM raises a number of issues with respect to competition policy and telecommunications regulation. In many countries a public comment process must take place before decisions can be made with respect to those issues. Mr Greisen states "the ITU and governments should not manage technology innovation.". I'm a bit perplexed by this statement since the ITU doesn't "manage" technology innovation - how technology innovation is "managed", if at all, is a national matter. While many governments do manage technology innovation, for example through subsidies to certain industries, or by imposing certain standards for wireless networks, or through trade barriers, or government-led industrial policy, other governments may take a hands-off approach. However, it is commonly accepted that governments should, at a minimum, exercise ex-post supervision of dominant market players and/or regulate monopolies. Because of the hierarchical and centralized nature of the domain name system, there can be only one Tier 1 ENUM registry for a country. Therefore, there is a de facto single operator for the top-level ENUM registry in a country. Most countries have held that this situation merits, at a minimum, a public consultation before deciding who that operator should be, and under what conditions it should offer its services to other parties. And this is because, at present, telephony is deregulated in most countries, so there are often a number of competing telephone operators and that is it likely to be the responsibility of the regulator or analagous government agency to ensure that there is equitable access for all service providers. RS -- Robert Shaw <robert.shaw () itu int> ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor Strategy and Policy Unit <http://www.itu.int/spu/> ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on ITU or ICANN - a case story from Denmark David Farber (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on ITU or ICANN - a case story from Denmark David Farber (Jan 12)
- more on ITU or ICANN - a case story from Denmark David Farber (Jan 13)