Interesting People mailing list archives

Texas Files New Spyware Claim Against Sony BMG


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:27:50 -0500



Begin forwarded message:

From: Bruce Hayden <bhayden () IEEE ORG>
Date: December 23, 2005 12:23:47 AM EST
To: CYBERIA-L () LISTSERV AOL COM
Subject: Re: [CYBERIA] Texas Files New Spyware Claim Against Sony BMG
Reply-To: Law & Policy of Computer Communications <CYBERIA- L () LISTSERV AOL COM>

Randall wrote:

http://htdaw.blogsource.com/post.mhtml?post_id=119253

Texas Files New Spyware Claim Against Sony BMG
December 22, 2005

By  Reuters
HOUSTON—The Texas attorney general said on Wednesday he added a new
claim to a lawsuit against Sony BMG Music Entertainment accusing it of
violating the state's laws on deceptive trade practices by hiding
"spyware" on its compact discs.

The SunnComm / MediaMax DRM code that Sony has included on a number
of its music CDs appears to be a bit different than the original First 4 XCP DRM software. While it does appear to provide some vulnerability for hacking, etc., it does not appear to be anywhere near as bad in that respect as XCP was,
or, indeed, the various fixes and removals that Sony provided for XCP.

However, it does still appear to "call home" to a Sony site in order to download advertising corresponding to the tune being played. This concept is called "Perfect Placement" by SunnComm / Media Max, but spyware/adware by others.

Also, software is apparently run even if the Sony EULA is declined.
SunnComm personnel claim that this is because there is a "gray area" between
when the CD is loaded and when the EULA is declined, and that what they
are essentially doing is running a TSR (terminate and stay resident) program. In other (not their, by my) words, they are installing the software and letting it run until next reboot. But it only becomes scheduled for automatic starting
as a service when the EULA is accepted.

My view is that this distinction is fallacious, and will be lost on the courts.
Yes, at one time, you could load software into memory without having to
write it to disk. But as far as I know, not with the present incarnation of Windows. So, Sony / SunnComm / Media Max are essentially claiming that even though they write the software to disk to run it, it isn't really installing it without permission because it isn't making it a service to run at subsequent boots.

I also see the writing of the software to disk to run it, regardless of
acceptance of the Sony EULA as essentially negating the EULA.
At a minimum, the EULA shouldn't protect them from installation
of the DRM software when it is declined.

For more information than you ever wanted on this subject:
http://sonyrootkit.blogspot.com/
http://www.sysinternals.com/blog/
http://www.eff.org/IP/DRM/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
http://www.boycottsony.us/

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The preceding was not a legal opinion, and is not my employer's.
Original portions Copyright 2005 Bruce E. Hayden,all rights reserved
My work may be copied in whole or part, with proper attribution,
as long as the copying is not for commercial gain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce E. Hayden                      bhayden () ieee org
Dillon, Colorado                     bhayden () softpats com
Phoenix, Arizona                     bhayden () highdown com


**********************************************************************
For Listserv Instructions, see http://www.lawlists.net/cyberia
Off-Topic threads: http://www.lawlists.net/mailman/listinfo/cyberia-ot
Need more help? Send mail to: Cyberia-L-Request () listserv aol com
**********************************************************************



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: