Interesting People mailing list archives
Health care and computers
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:06:50 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Kende <Michael.Kende () analysys com> Date: December 10, 2005 4:17:41 PM EST To: dave () farber net Subject: Health care and computers Dave, If you see fit for IP, I have a question about the computerization, or lack thereof, of hospital health care. Having spent more time than I would care to have in the past few years around hospitals, there is an obvious reformulation of Robert Solow's quote, that one can see computers everywhere in the hospital except in productivity. I wonderedif anyone had any thoughts why this is (or why my perception is not correct)?
For those of you fortunate enough not to have recent experience in hospitals, these are some observations from some of the big hospitals in the Washington DC region including Georgetown and Sibley: - check-in is painfully slow, even if they have previous records, even in the emergency room. Georgetown actually photocopies drivers license and insurance cards each time for even for regularly scheduled visits. - although all information is input into computers, it comes out as papers onto clipboards and gets carried around that way from then on. Several weeks ago one of my relatives was at the emergency room and noDoctor came to see her because her clipboard was not in the triage slot (I had to
find it).- no records of previous medical information seem to be (readily) available. This
same relative had been multiple times in the same hospital for the same reason, but when they noticed that her blood pressure was low they had to ask us if this was uncommon, rather than simply check records. - not sure how Doctor's orders get passed through the system, but I know that they start on paper in cupboards outside each room (at least at Sibley) So the question is, why can the Hilton check someone in faster than the emergency room, even for a repeat visit, and keep and use information abuot previous visits such as newspaper preference (whereas the hospital has to find out each time about a penicillin allergy)? Why does a Doctor come into the room with less computer power in his/her hands than the UPS delivery person? What am I missing? I guess possible explanations include: - budgets, except that the hospitals all do have computers everywhere, it is just not clear what goes in and what is available afterwards. - privacy, but could that explain the same hospital not having easily available records on the same person? - others? Given the size of health care in the economy, and the potential impact on lowering costs, not to mention better diagnosis and prevention of mistakes, it would be interesting to learn both what I am missing in terms of what the existing computers are used for and why the whole process does not seem more computerized, Thanks in advance, Michael Michael Kende Principal Consultant Analysys Consulting Tel: 1 202 349-1114 Fax: 1 202 349-1113The information in this Internet email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this Internet email by anyone else is unauthorised.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in the Internet email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing engagement letter or contract.
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Health care and computers David Farber (Dec 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Health care and computers David Farber (Dec 11)