Interesting People mailing list archives

Government to End Public Nuclear Updates


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 19:15:34 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: Megan Holbrook <megan () kapow com>
Date: August 4, 2004 7:50:58 PM EDT
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Government to End Public Nuclear Updates

Hi Dave -

Thought this might be interesting for IP. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced it will no longer reveal security gaps it has found at nuclear power plants to prevent terrorists from using the information. This of course raises concerns as to accountability if the information isn't public. Releasing general statistics and number of incidents for each plant might at least provide some way of tracking whether security and safety measures are proving useful - that hasn't yet been suggested, unfortunately.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apus_story.asp? category=1110&slug=Nuclear%20Security

        

Wednesday, August 4, 2004 ยท Last updated 12:18 p.m. PT

Gov't to end public nuclear updates

By MALIA RULON
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

WASHINGTON -- The government will no longer reveal security gaps discovered at nuclear power plants, hoping to prevent terrorists from using the information, regulators said Wednesday.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced the change in policy during its first public meeting on power plant safety since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Until now, the NRC has provided regular public updates on vulnerabilities its inspectors found at the country's 103 nuclear power reactors, such as broken fences or weaknesses in training programs.

"We need to blacken some of our processes so that our adversaries won't have that information," said Roy Zimmerman, director of the commission's Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, which was created after the attacks.

NRC spokesman Scott Burnell said commissioners voted to take the step March 29, but kept it quiet as agency staff worked to implement the plan. The vote itself was revealed Wednesday.

"We deliberated for many months on finding the balance between the NRC's commitment to openness and the concern that sensitive information might be misused by those who wish us harm," commission Chairman Nils Diaz said in a written statement.

Protection at the nation's nuclear power reactors - located at 64 sites in 31 states - has been ratcheted up since the Sept. 11 attacks. The commission has long been guarded about revealing specifics of the security efforts.

But that has not stopped accusations of inadequate guard training and other security lapses.

Congressional investigations have found problems such as a guard falling asleep on the job and lost keys to sensitive areas. Reports from the Energy Department's inspector general noted other problems, such as guards being warned of upcoming security exercises and inconsistent training from site to site.

Nuclear activists have expressed concern about the adequacy of guard training, fire protection, the security of pools containing spent nuclear fuel, and planning for different kinds of attacks.

"The vulnerabilities at a lot of the reactors in this country have not been addressed," said Jim Riccio, a nuclear policy analyst for Greenpeace. "Here we are nearly three years from the attacks and I don't see anything they've done except extending the perimeters of these facilities."

In the weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, operators at the nation's nuclear power plants posted more guards, added security patrols and reduced access to the installations' most sensitive areas.

Military planes at nearby bases stood ready to intercept any suspicious aircraft, the Coast Guard patrolled the Great Lakes near power plants to keep ships away, and many facilities enlisted the help of National Guard troops.

Some critics have said nothing short of military occupation of the plants will provide adequate safety. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said in May that the possibility of creating a federal police force to guard nuclear plants was being seriously discussed.

Paul Gunter, a nuclear expert at the watchdog group Nuclear Information and Resource Service, said he's worried that plants since 1992 have been allowed to delay implementation of fire protection equipment for control room cables.

"Our major concern is that the NRC really has to stop protecting the nuclear power industry from the cost of security and really start protecting it from the clear and present danger of terrorism," Gunter said.

---

On the Net:

http://www.nrc.gov
--
Megan Holbrook - megan () kapow com
Partner - Business Development
kapow, inc. (www.kapow.com) - website design and development

kapow, inc. Milwaukee               kapow, inc. Los Angeles
2405 E. Wyoming Place               2130 Sawtelle Blvd, #302A
Milwaukee, WI 53202                 Los Angeles, CA 90025
T: 414-273-2446 * F: 419-793-6271   T: 310-479-2020 * F: 310-473-3711


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: