Interesting People mailing list archives

don¹t buy that small car yet


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:25:59 +0900


------ Forwarded Message
From: Shannon McElyea <Shannon () swisscreek com>
Reply-To: Shannon () DeepNines com
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:58:21 -0800
To: Mark Laubach <mark () swisscreek com>, David Farber <dave () farber net>,
Robert J Berger <rberger () ibd com>
Subject: Bush Proposal May Cut Tax on S.U.V.'s for Business


 unbelievable -- how aggregregious can ShrubCo get?? If the Iraq war is not
about oil, then why is nothing done to decrease our dependency on
oil...sigh...why don't we subsidize hybrids, higher mileage standards and
lower emmissions?


http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/21/business/21AUTO.html?ex=1043902800&en=33b1
e7a5daa4d527&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

Bush Proposal May Cut Tax on S.U.V.'s for Business
By DANNY HAKIM


ETROIT, Jan. 20 — The Bush administration's economic plan would increase by
50 percent or more the deductions that small-business owners can take right
away on the biggest sport utility vehicles and pickups.

The plan would mean small businesses could immediately deduct the entire
price of S.U.V.'s like the Hummer H2, the Lincoln Navigator and the Toyota
Land Cruiser, even if the vehicles were loaded with every available option.
Or a business owner, taking full advantage, could buy a BMW X5 sport utility
vehicle for a few hundred dollars more than a Pontiac Bonneville sedan,
after the immediate tax deductions were factored in.

Advertisement




Tax experts and environmentalists say the plan would provide incentives for
businesses to choose the biggest gas-guzzling trucks because it takes
several years to depreciate the cost of passenger cars and smaller sport
utility vehicles. The ramifications of the Bush plan on S.U.V. buyers were
reported today in The Detroit News.

The potential lift for sales of big S.U.V.'s comes amid rising tension in
the Middle East and increasing criticism of S.U.V.'s from environmentalists
and regulators.

But a top budget official said today that the administration might be open
to changes in the tax code that would bring cars more in line with big
trucks.

"We have an open mind about whether the deduction for cars needs to be
refined," said Dr. John Graham, the administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget.

The tax code now caps deductions for most automobiles. But the largest
vehicles — those that weigh more than 6,000 pounds fully loaded — are exempt
because the relevant portion of the code was written in the 1980's, before
the rise of the sport utility vehicle, and was intended to exempt big
pickups needed on work sites. Now the tax incentives also give business
owners not involved in hauling — doctors, real estate agents, accountants —
more incentive to buy the biggest S.U.V.'s instead of smaller ones, or cars.

The proposal "makes a glitch in the tax code much worse and it benefits rich
businessmen who want to buy massive S.U.V.'s," said Aileen Roder, program
director for Taxpayers for Common Sense. "In essence we're buying these
vehicles for these businesses."

But the administration says that greater business deductions will be a
potent economic stimulant.

"Many small businesses have genuine needs for large vans, pickups and
S.U.V.'s, whether it be for a farm, sales or industrial application," Dr.
Graham said. "An updated tax deduction for small businesses is certainly
needed."

Consider the Hummer H1 as an example of the new deduction. It is one of the
largest and most expensive S.U.V.'s, with a base sticker price of $102,581,
including destination charge. Under the Bush plan, small-business owners
could use all of an annual $75,000 capital equipment deduction toward the
purchase; the current equipment deduction allowance is just $25,000.

That is in addition to thousands of dollars in other deductions. Under
existing rules, a business could deduct 30 percent from the base price left
after the capital equipment deduction, a benefit put in place as part of a
post-Sept. 11 stimulus package. In the case of the H1, that would be a
further deduction of $8,274.

Finally, 20 percent could be deducted from what is left, part of the
business deductions available for automobiles. For the H1, that would be
$3,861 more in deductions.

The total would be more than $87,000 in deductions, or about $33,500 in
savings in federal taxes alone for buyers in the highest bracket. Under
current rules, just less than $60,000 could be deducted.

Deals for cars and small sport utility vehicles are much less appealing.
Currently, a business can deduct no more than $7,660 for a car in its first
year of service, $4,900 in the second year and less in the succeeding years.
The Toyota Prius, which uses a fuel-efficient blend of gasoline and electric
power, is eligible for an additional $2,000 clean vehicle deduction. That
means a business owner could deduct under half of the $20,500 sticker price
of the Prius in the first year of purchase, for about $3,700 worth of
federal tax savings for those in the highest tax bracket.

David Friedman, an engineer and analyst at the Union of Concerned
Scientists, an environmental group, said the increased deduction for big
vehicles was "yet another loophole that the government is keeping open that
is increasing our oil dependence."

"Before, it was large enough to drive a small S.U.V. through," he added.
"Now it's large enough to drive a Hummer through."

Without altering the treatment of cars in the tax code, the Bush plan could
run counter to the administration's recent decision to force automakers to
improve the fuel economy of S.U.V.'s, pickups and minivans by 7 percent by
middecade.

That is probably why the administration is open minded when it comes to
reviewing the tax treatment of different kinds of vehicles.

Dr. Graham reiterated today that the administration was also considering
further fuel economy measures. S.U.V.'s and pickups that weigh more than
8,500 pounds fully loaded have been exempt from federal fuel regulations.
But the administration "is currently investigating whether those rules
should be extended to larger light trucks" weighing as much as 10,000
pounds, he said.




------ End of Forwarded Message

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To unsubscribe or update your address, click
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: