Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Possible Crypto Breakthrough?
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 06:22:36 -0400
------ Forwarded Message From: Seth Finkelstein <sethf () sethf com> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 06:33:49 -0400 To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: Re: [IP] Possible Crypto Breakthrough? [For IP] Dave, that article is, unsurprisingly, sensationalized. See: "The PRIMES is in P little FAQ" http://crypto.cs.mcgill.ca/~stiglic/PRIMES_P_FAQ.html Q12. Could this result break cryptographic algorithms? No. As mentioned above, fast randomized algorithms for primality testing were already known, and in fact they are necessary just to make most known public key cryptosystems feasible! Some people confuse the factorization problem with the problem of distinguishing prime numbers from composite numbers. The factorization problem is: given an integer n, try to find the prime numbers which when multiplied together give n. The fundamental theorem of arithmetic states that every integer n can indeed be factored into prime numbers, and in a unique way, so the problem makes sense for any integer. If one could efficiently factor large integers, then certain cryptographic algorithms would be broken (such as the famous RSA encryption and signature schemes). The fact that PRIME has been found to be in P cannot be used to break any cryptographic algorithms. Q13. Does this result have any impact in cryptography at all? Not in any obvious ways. Certain algorithms need to generate prime numbers in order to construct cryptographic keys, but algorithms to accomplish this which can be executed very efficiently already existed before the result in [1]. The most commonly used ones have a probability of error, but this error can be made to be arbitrarily small (see question 9) and thus they give us practically the same assurance as the algorithm proposed in P. These algorithms that are commonly used in practice are actually faster than the ones proposed in [1]. The result in [1] is a very important one in complexity theory, but probably have no (practical) impact in cryptography. * [1] Manindra Agrawal, Neeraj Kayal and Nitin Saxena, PRIMES is in P: http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/news/primality.html Also http://www.sciencenews.org/20021026/bob9.asp -- Seth Finkelstein Consulting Programmer sethf () sethf com http://sethf.com Anticensorware Investigations - http://sethf.com/anticensorware/ Seth Finkelstein's Infothought blog - http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/ ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Possible Crypto Breakthrough? Dave Farber (Apr 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on Possible Crypto Breakthrough? Dave Farber (Apr 06)