Interesting People mailing list archives

The New Cold War


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:35:47 -0400


------ Forwarded Message
From: Wired News <wired () mailbox lycos com>
Reply-To: nobody () mailbox lycos com
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:45:06 +0000
To: farber0 <dave () farber net>
Subject: Online Anonymity Comes Under Fire

 Get Ready for the New Cold War (Wired magazine 2:00 a.m. PDT)
 http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.05/view.html?pg=4
 India and China are picking up where the U.S. and Soviet Union left
off. So says Bruce Sterling in this commentary for Wired magazine.

------ End of Forwarded Message

The New Cold War

India and China are picking up where the US and Soviet Union left off.

By Bruce Sterling


Scott Menchin The catastrophic failure of the Columbia rocked America's
commitment to manned space flight, but it galvanized that of another nation:
India. Kalpana Chawla, who died in the disaster, wasn't the first
Indian-born astronaut in space, but she was a small-town girl who
transcended every third-world limit to storm the cosmos. Her lesson hasn't
been lost on a billion Indians.

Nobody in the Western press takes much notice of India's space aspirations,
because by Yankee standards it doesn't make sense for India to have any. Yet
India launched its first missile in 1963 and its first cosmonaut in 1984.
Nobody in the West thought the country would ever go nuclear, either. That
was a blunder in judgment.

Nuclear bombs pack a staggering strategic punch when paired with big
missiles. Big missiles provide passage to outer space. To loft big payloads
into orbit is to have planetary first-strike capability. India's hefty new
Agni III nuclear missiles have a 1,860-mile range, and other homegrown
rockets are placing small weather and spy sats in orbit. India's space
agency, ISRO, plans a $50 million lunar flyby in 2008.


EMEK Why is Gandhi's homeland trying to reach the moon when people sleep on
the streets in Calcutta and AIDS gnaws the country's flesh? For the same
reason the US sloughed off poverty programs to fund Apollo in the 1960s:
global prestige. 

India doesn't need long-range missiles to nuke neighbor and archrival
Pakistan. For a war that intimate, bullock carts would do. The Agni III is
aimed straight at world public opinion. The India-Pakistan PR skirmish is
already almost over, and India is clearly winning. Every great power sweats
bullets over Pakistan's bomb, but India's somehow makes that country worthy
of consideration for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.

Although the Pakistanis have a bomb, they have to scrounge North Korean Scud
missiles to deliver it - and therein lies a lesson the ruthless "realists"
of India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party well understand. Pakistan can't
compete in a space race with India. Pakistan lacks the big money and the
aerospace chops, and if it keeps trying to match India's grand achievements,
as it always has, it will end up broke and humiliated.

Pakistan has no counterpart to the Agni III, but China does. China's Long
March 2 rocket can launch a satellite and, in its weaponized Don Feng 5
version, drop a 4-megaton warhead practically anywhere on the planet - India
most definitely included.

India and China are comers with a lot to prove to the world, and especially
to each other. Their rivalry has roots. In a 1962 shooting war, China
grabbed some real estate in the Kashmir region and sent India's army
reeling. India never forgot the affront, and the dispute still smolders
today.

Since India demonstrated its bomb in 1998, the Chinese have been
increasingly uneasy. China reacted to the detonation with angry demands that
the international community keep India contained. When that got nowhere,
China helped Pakistan go nuclear. In retrospect, that was a scary,
destabilizing misstep. But now India and China are poised to continue their
rivalry on safer high ground - beyond Earth's atmosphere.

Nuclear India versus nuclear China is Kennedy versus Kruschev, and Reagan
versus Gorbachev, all over again. Now, as then, a space race is a sexy
alternative to nuclear annihilation.

China has openly declared its desire to colonize the moon. The world's most
populous nation is unlikely to build lunar settlements, but that's not the
point. China's motive lies not in constructing a lunar Hong Kong, but rather
in luring India into a loud public competition. Later this year, if all goes
as planned, China will become the third country to send a citizen into
space. An orbiting taikonaut will be even more impressive if American
shuttles are stuck in their hangars while the misnamed International Space
Station limps along with a skeleton crew.

As Russia once did, China has a strong technical advantage. It already owns
a chunk of the commercial space-launch business. But India has a decent shot
at victory as well. It doesn't have China's manufacturing know-how, but it's
rapidly becoming the world's software back office.

Who will become top dog in South Asia? That's an open question, and there
aren't many good ways to answer short of a useless massacre. A space race
offers a good solution. It's a symbolic tournament that tests competing
political and economic systems to their limit.

A decade after the end of the Cold War, good old-fashioned space programs
still matter. Not for exploration's sake, but to settle new cold wars. If
you doubt it, imagine this scenario: It's 2029, and a lunar mission lands at
Tranquillity Base. A crew of heroic young Indians - or Chinese - quietly
folds and puts away America's 60-year-old flag. If the world saw that on
television, wouldn't the gesture be worth tens of billions of rupees or
yuan? Of course it would.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email Bruce Sterling at bruces () well com.

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To manage your subscription, go to
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: