Interesting People mailing list archives
Better not bark in Palo Alto...
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:41:49 -0700
------ Forwarded Message From: Paul Saffo <psaffo () iftf org> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:35:15 -0700 To: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu> Subject: Better not bark in Palo Alto... Only in California -- and hopefully only in Palo Alto. If this goes to trial I expect the defendant to introduce expert testimony to the effect that his bark was friendly and respectful. Me, I pity Odin the shepherd for having such a humorless idiot of a guaradian as Officer Wilkie. -p --------- Posted on Wed, Apr. 23, 2003 BARKING NO JOKE TO COP By Jessie Seyfer Mercury News When a Palo Alto police dog barked at Richard Dillon, the Menlo Park man barked back. Dillon's actions didn't amuse Palo Alto police, who cited him on a misdemeanor charge of taunting a police dog. On Tuesday, Dillon pleaded not guilty in Santa Clara County court. Now Dillon hopes to go to trial, because he thinks the charge is ``ridiculous,'' said his attorney, Donald Tasto. Dillon was arrested March 5 at about 12:20 a.m., police said. He and a co-worker were walking down Ramona Avenue in Palo Alto after enjoying a night of Mardi Gras festivities, Tasto said. As Dillon approached Palo Alto police officer Bob Wilkie's squad car -- occupied only by Odin, the canine -- Odin began to bark, said police spokesman Jim Coffman. As Dillon passed the open back window, he barked back at the dog. A heavy-duty wire screen was all that separated man and beast, Coffman said. Police say Dillon not only barked, but also shook his fist at Odin. Wilkie cited Dillon on a charge of willfully and maliciously interfering with the duties of a police dog. Dillon denies that he shook his fist at Odin, and said he only barked once at the dog, from a distance of about 10 feet, Tasto said. Neither Wilkie nor Dillon could be reached for comment Tuesday. The charge, which carries a maximum penalty of a year in jail, is unfair for two reasons, Tasto said: Dillon didn't bark maliciously, and Odin wasn't working at the time. Santa Clara County prosecutors said they couldn't yet comment on Dillon's claims. ``We are currently reviewing the law and investigating the facts in more detail,'' said supervising deputy district attorney Jay Boyarsky. Dillon's next hearing in Santa Clara County court is Thursday. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contact Jessie Seyfer at jseyfer () mercurynews com or (650) 688-7531. http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/5695960.htm ------ End of Forwarded Message ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Better not bark in Palo Alto... Dave Farber (Apr 23)