Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Billy Tauzin featured in Slate
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:53:36 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: "Bob Frankston" <BobRMFxix () Bobf Frankston com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:47:12 -0500 To: "David Farber" <dave () farber net> Subject: Billy Tauzin featured in Slate I wrote this note last night and wanted time to mull it. It is interesting to note how much the Enron story makes great theater whereas the Telecom issues that are more significant go unnoticed. I also happen to be listening to the C-Span as I write this. It is a replay of a 12/5/2001 episode on Watergate including Nixon's explicit orders to stop pursuing specific anti-trust cases. Billy Tauzin is the co-author of the Tauzin-Dingell bill that will perpetuate the incumbents control over connectivity and assure that the current businesses are preserved by preventing new ones from threatening them. (An admittedly biased summary) I was going to just forward a pointer to the article but in reading it I felt obliged to comment further. So far, as much as I've ranted about the telecommunications situation Ive given the benefit of the doubt to the players. For example, Ive hesitated to compare the Bells with Enron but there is a parallel in that the accounting practices of the Bells might be mathematically correct but the premises are completely fictitious as they are based on regulatory constructs rather than a marketplace. The articles points out that he is pro-business. But there is a big difference between preserving current companies (by, for example, shielding them from scrutiny) and preserving business in the sense of facilitating the marketplace. It is easier to talk about a static entity like a company than the process of business which seems more abstract. In an attempt to learn more I went to his web site at http://www.house.gov/tauzin/ and then the English version but the site hasnt been updated in a long time. The name of the bill he is sponsoring the Internet Freedom and Broadband Deployment Act of 2001 -- http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c107:1:./temp/~c107oEqT7i:: In looking at the bill the key provision is (a) FREEDOM FROM REGULATION- Except to the extent that high speed data service and Internet access service are expressly referred to in this Act, neither the Commission, nor any State, shall have authority to regulate the rates, charges, terms, or conditions for, or entry into the provision of, any high speed data service or Internet access service, or to regulate the facilities used in the provision of either such service. While the bill is supposed to provide a choice of Internet Service Providers it fails to provide a choice of ACCESS providers. This is part of the basic misunderstanding. The problem is not in being unable to reach a particular service; it is in having sufficient access to the Internet to invent new services. Where is the incentive to increase the access beyond minimal goals? It would be nice if the removal of regulations also removes protection from anti-trust but that is probably too much to expect. ======================================= The story is at http://slate.msn.com/?id=2062048 Rep. Billy Tauzin The Potemkin populism of the Republicans' chief Enron investigator. By David Plotz Updated Friday, February 15, 2002, at 8:02 AM PT Some Excerpts (Title) Rep. Billy Tauzin: The Potemkin populism of the Republicans chief Enron investigator Tauzin looks like the second coming of his famous Democratic predecessor, Rep. John Dingell Yet more than Dingell, Tauzin is a perverse kind of consumer advocateone for whom the theater is much more important than the substance. Tauzin, a former amateur actor, calls his Enron hearings the show, and that is clearly how he thinks of them. ... doesnt believe government should interfere in broadcast news operations. Tauzin wants to outrage, but he philosophically opposes doing anything about it. As a legislatoras opposed to investigatorTauzin works diligently to advance American business. He is an enormous supporter of the Baby Bells and the broadcast industry, and an enormous recipient of their largesse. (William Safire once called him a wholly owned subsidiary of the broadcasters.) Tauzin has pushed deregulation and blocked the Securities and Exchange Commissions effort in 2000 to more strictly regulate the accounting industry. Such regulationsnotably limiting accounting firms from consulting with companies they auditmight have split the demonic marriage between Andersen and Enron. Tauzin, it wont surprise anyone to learn, took more campaign contributions from Andersen than any other House member in the past dozen years. It would be a lot braverand arguably more consistent with his deregulating, free-marketing principlesfor Tauzin to defend Enron and Andersen. But that would not be fun, would not be showy, would not be popular, would not be Tauzin. Bob Frankston http://www.Frankston.com ------ End of Forwarded Message For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- IP: Billy Tauzin featured in Slate Dave Farber (Feb 18)