Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: more on Dan Gillmor: Entertainment industry's copyright fight puts consumers in cross hairs
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 10:42:08 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic () well com> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 10:18:04 -0500 To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Cc: dgillmor () sjmercury com Subject: Re: IP: Dan Gillmor: Entertainment industry's copyright fight puts consumers in cross hairs Dave, Dan Gillmor is absolutely right that the current lawsuits against the makers of personal video recorders like ReplayTV signify a longstanding opposition from Hollywood content companies to consumer recording and copying technologies (dating back to VCRs and various audiotaping tech). What really scares them about ReplayTV, though, is something new: the fact that the resulting copies are (a) digitally "perfect" copies of TV content that themselves can be perfectly copied, and (b) transmissible over the Internet. (A similar fear, based on the Napster phenomenon, is also the explanation for music companies' efforts to develop and sell noncopyable audio CDs.) The court pleadings in the latest ReplayTV case may focus on the technology's keyword-search functions and commercial-skipping features, but those are side issues -- the content companies are willing to concede to home viewers some degree of personal copying, for example. What freaks them out is the ability of ReplayTV viewers to forward favorite shows to other viewers over the Internet. Any legal strategy that might slow or block the deployment of ReplayTV and similar PVRs is thus worth pursuing, they believe, if it helps prevent more consumers from forwarding (and trading, and duplicating) copies of digital content. All this is part of a larger content-company opposition to the ways in which digital technologies and the Internet empower consumers. I discuss this larger war (the ReplayTV case is only one small battle in that war) in an article I've posted at <http://cryptome.org/mpaa-v-net-mg.htm>. Dan is also right that the content companies have been winning their court fights. What this likely means is that there will be renewed effort in Congress, sooner rather than later, to address the balances of copyright law in the digital age. Some content companies will seek further legislative restrictions on digital copying technologies, while other players, including some IT and consumer-electronics companies and public-interest groups, will labor to protect what they say as consumers' fundamental rights to engage in some degree of copying -- a right they believe is well-grounded in the law and public policy of copyright. --Mike Godwin -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- "I speak the password primeval .... I give the sign of democracy ...." --Walt Whitman Mike Godwin can be reached by phone at 202-637-9800 His book, CYBER RIGHTS, can be ordered at http://www.panix.com/~mnemonic . -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ End of Forwarded Message For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- IP: more on Dan Gillmor: Entertainment industry's copyright fight puts consumers in cross hairs Dave Farber (Feb 17)