Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Re: SLEW OF SUPREME COURT CASES TO FOCUS ON '96 TELECOM LAW
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 09:05:23 -0400
From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com> [Note: This comment comes from reader Tim Pozar. DLH] At 17:01 -0700 10/3/01, Tim Pozar wrote:From: Tim Pozar <pozar () lns com> To: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com> Subject: Re: SLEW OF SUPREME COURT CASES TO FOCUS ON '96 TELECOM LAW Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:01:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 I very much wish I could be party to some of these cases and see if we can strike down the de-regulation of the broadcast industry with this Act. With the Telecom Act of '96 and ownership de-regulation, radio stations have been bought up so fast that prices for licenses have sky-rocketed 1,000% in the last decade. Debt service on these purchases have trimmed back staff to the bare bones and limit stations to the lowest common denominator of programming of formats. "Radical" syndicated programming such as Howard Stern or Rush is far cheaper to run and draws more "ears" than local programming. Innovation is out of favor as corporations need to address safe bets to keep their stock at over-inflated levels. The Telecom Act of 96 also struck the last nail in to the coffin so that the spectrum is not used as a public resource any longer. Public access and responsibility such as the quarterly community ascertainment reports or even just news coverage are out the window. And it isn't the commercial stations that have been affected. With a number of FCC policy missives "underwriting" announcements have turn into a cash cow for non-commercial stations. Underwriting announcements were originally designed to disclose bias or other interests in the production of a program. Now they are being treated exactly like commercials on licenses that are required not to run commercials. At this rate the 4MHz of non-commercial spectrum out of the 20Mhz of FM spectrum should be taken back and open up to all broadcasters. Hrumph... Tim
For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
Current thread:
- IP: Re: SLEW OF SUPREME COURT CASES TO FOCUS ON '96 TELECOM LAW David Farber (Oct 04)