Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Congress Moving Towards Expanded Internet Surveillance


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 16:57:31 -0400


<http://www.cdt.org/testimony/011003berman.shtml>http://www.cdt.org/testimony/011003berman.shtml

Testimony of Jerry Berman
Executive Director
Center for Democracy & Technology

before the
Senate Judiciary Committee
Subcommittee on Constitution, Federalism, and Property Rights

on
Protecting Constitutional Freedoms in the Face of Terrorism
October 3, 2001
Summary
Thank you for the opportunity to testify at this hearing on the momentous question of improving our nation's defenses against terrorism in a manner consistent with our fundamental Constitutional liberties. CDT joins the nation in grief and anger over the devastating loss of life resulting from the September 11 terrorist hijackings and attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Like many, our relatively small staff had friends and acquaintances killed in those heinous acts. We strongly support the efforts of our government to hold accountable those who direct and support such atrocities. We know from history, however, that measures hastily undertaken in times of peril - particularly measures that weaken controls on government exercise of coercive or intrusive powers - often infringe civil liberties without enhancing security. For that reason, we harbor serious reservations about several bills currently under discussion in this Subcommittee and elsewhere on Capitol Hill. In particular, we are deeply concerned about the Administration's proposed "Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001" (ATA). A recently-circulated alternate package, the Sensenbrenner-Conyers "Provide Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (PATRIOT) Act," removes or changes a very few concerns in ATA, but retains most of the provisions damaging to civil liberties. The concerns we raise in this testimony, unless otherwise noted, apply equally to both bills. We are deeply concerned about the impact of these bills on constitutional liberties, most particularly in two areas. First, the ATA and PATRIOT Act tear down the "wall" between the government's authority to conduct counter-intelligence surveillance against foreign powers and terrorist groups, and its authority to conduct criminal investigations of Americans. In the post-Watergate era, Congress carefully constrained the government from inappropriately mixing its foreign intelligence and law enforcement capabilities, since such mixing would greatly infringe Americans' constitutional freedoms. The current bills eviscerate that division. Both would change the "primary purpose" standard that permits exceptional surveillance but only when counter-intelligence is "the" primary purpose of an investigation. Instead, the bills would make these extraordinary powers open to all investigations in which counter-intelligence is "a" (or, in the PATRIOT Act, "a significant") purpose (Sec. 153). As a result, they would permit law enforcement to use constitutionally suspect surveillance techniques‹ secret searches, bugs, and wiretapping‹against Americans in criminal investigations without the protections that Congress originally intended. Besides damaging the civil liberties of law-abiding Americans who may have their communications subjected to secret interception, the bill raises the possibility that criminal prosecutions pursued in this way could be thrown out on constitutional grounds. At the same time, the ATA and PATRIOT Act allow data collected in a criminal investigation to be shared widely, without judicial review and regardless of whether those activities serve a law enforcement or counter-intelligence purpose (Sec. 154). This would include the content of Title III wiretaps and evidence presented to grand juries, both of which are traditionally protected under law. Such a revision to the law would permit such troubling activities as the development by the CIA or other intelligence agencies of dossiers for Americans not suspected of any criminal activity.



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: