Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Future of the Internet and ICANN


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 13:18:40 -0500


Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 10:14:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com>
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Future of the Internet and ICANN
Cc: lauren () pfir org, neumann () pfir org

As much as we respect Mike Roberts and his work, it is difficult to find his
recent statements [1], about the "new ICANN" as anything other than extremely
"problematic" at best.  ICANN's continuing controversies and problems have
in large part been a function of ICANN's taking on functions well outside
its appropriate purview.  As we have discussed previously [2], ICANN's
historical basis and structure have not been and remain unsuitable for many
of the tasks it has attempted to date, even given their sincere efforts.

Recent events have not fundamentally altered the importance of the Internet.
The Internet's crucial contributions to the world's infrastructure far
predate the horrors so fresh in our minds, although some persons have only
now begun to appreciate this reality.  But what has also long been true is
that ICANN's stewardship of various key functions relating to the Net
has been inadequate in many important respects.

We continue to consider ICANN's deficiencies to be structural and
increasingly intractable as the organization has stretched beyond its core
competencies.  Our calls for the creation of a truly representative
organization to help coordinate a comprehensive range of critical Internet
responsibilities [3], seems more crucial now than ever before.

Arguments claiming that ICANN is "the only game in town" and that not
supporting ICANN risks chaos, nationalization, and other unwelcome prospects
are fallacious and seem to border on fear-mongering.  The assignment of
further important responsibilities to ICANN (by government or other groups)
would only exacerbate already serious problems.  This is particularly true
for critical aspects of the Internet, such as reliability and security, that
go far beyond the relatively minor niceties of domain name assignment
policies.

ICANN itself is not the issue.  It is specifically the security, safety,
reliability and numerous other attributes of the Internet that should be our
central focus.  Now is the time to "bite the bullet" and admit to ourselves
that ICANN is not the appropriate venue to be dealing with most of these
extremely important matters.

Rather than trying to continue building upon the limited framework of ICANN,
we need to decide that we're going to do what's right for the Internet and
the world.  Even the best technological concepts and "solutions" will be
utterly meaningless in the absence of such a course.  We must take
responsibility for our actions and move forward with the establishment of
*appropriate* organizations that will provide a firm and stable foundation
for the future of the Net and its users.  Any other path may well lead us
directly into the abyss.

     [1] Message from Mike Roberts
         http://atlargestudy.org/forum_archive/msg01113.shtml

     [2] PFIR Statement on Internet Policies, Regulations, and Control
         http://www.pfir.org/statements/policies

     [3] Proposal for a Representative Global Internet Policy Organization
         http://www.pfir.org/statements/proposal

 - - - - -

Lauren Weinstein
lauren () pfir org or lauren () vortex com or lauren () privacyforum org
Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
Co-Founder, Fact Squad - http://www.factsquad.org
Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com
Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy

Peter G. Neumann
neumann () pfir org or neumann () csl sri com or neumann () risks org
Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
Co-Founder, Fact Squad - http://www.factsquad.org
Moderator, RISKS Forum - http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks
Chairman, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
http://www.csl.sri.com/neumann


For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: